ZMUN vs. MNBD
ZMUN (F/m Ultrashort Tax-Free Municipal ETF) and MNBD (ALPS Intermediate Municipal Bond ETF) are both Municipal Bonds funds. ZMUN is passively managed, while MNBD is actively managed. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ZMUN charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for MNBD.
Performance
ZMUN vs. MNBD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZMUN achieves a 1.61% return, which is significantly higher than MNBD's 1.36% return.
ZMUN
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.31%
- YTD
- 1.61%
- 6M
- 1.88%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MNBD
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.34%
- YTD
- 1.36%
- 6M
- 1.73%
- 1Y
- 6.15%
- 3Y*
- 4.42%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ZMUN vs. MNBD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ZMUN F/m Ultrashort Tax-Free Municipal ETF | 1.61% | 0.73% |
MNBD ALPS Intermediate Municipal Bond ETF | 1.36% | 1.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZMUN and MNBD is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2025 | 0.13 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZMUN vs. MNBD — Risk / Return Rank
ZMUN
MNBD
ZMUN vs. MNBD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for F/m Ultrashort Tax-Free Municipal ETF (ZMUN) and ALPS Intermediate Municipal Bond ETF (MNBD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ZMUN | MNBD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.47 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 6.54 | 1.20 | +5.34 |
Drawdowns
ZMUN vs. MNBD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZMUN drawdown since its inception was -0.09%, smaller than the maximum MNBD drawdown of -5.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZMUN and MNBD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZMUN | MNBD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.09% | -5.89% | +5.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -2.38% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -3.97% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.88% | +0.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.01% | -1.09% | +1.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.72% | — |
Volatility
ZMUN vs. MNBD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZMUN | MNBD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.87% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 1.94% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54% | 2.50% | -1.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.54% | 3.77% | -3.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.54% | 3.77% | -3.23% |
ZMUN vs. MNBD - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZMUN has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than MNBD's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
ZMUN vs. MNBD - Dividend Comparison
ZMUN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.28%, less than MNBD's 3.32% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MNBD ALPS Intermediate Municipal Bond ETF | 3.32% | 3.32% | 3.83% | 3.44% | 2.40% |
ZMUN F/m Ultrashort Tax-Free Municipal ETF | 2.28% | 0.70% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ZMUN and MNBD have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ZMUN is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ZMUN is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for MNBD.
MNBD has the higher dividend yield at 3.32%, compared with 2.28% for ZMUN.
They also come from different issuers: F/m Investments and ALPS. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for ZMUN and 0.50% for MNBD.
Find the right allocation for ZMUN and MNBD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer