PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZMT.TO vs. VIDY.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ZMT.TO vs. VIDY.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BMO S&P/TSX Equal Weight Global Base Metals (CAD Hedged) (ZMT.TO) and Vanguard FTSE Developed ex North America High Dividend Yield Index ETF (VIDY.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZMT.TO achieves a 39.44% return, which is significantly higher than VIDY.TO's 10.45% return.


ZMT.TO

1D
-3.52%
1M
16.19%
YTD
39.44%
6M
46.49%
1Y
109.69%
3Y*
42.46%
5Y*
20.69%
10Y*
17.71%

VIDY.TO

1D
-0.53%
1M
3.26%
YTD
10.45%
6M
11.80%
1Y
27.71%
3Y*
22.64%
5Y*
15.12%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZMT.TO vs. VIDY.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
ZMT.TO
BMO S&P/TSX Equal Weight Global Base Metals (CAD Hedged)
39.44%63.17%15.30%14.54%-6.65%11.04%14.70%15.82%-24.21%
VIDY.TO
Vanguard FTSE Developed ex North America High Dividend Yield Index ETF
10.45%34.37%13.41%15.46%1.54%14.21%-2.65%13.21%-5.68%

Correlation

The correlation between ZMT.TO and VIDY.TO is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.36

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 29, 2018

0.43

ZMT.TO vs. VIDY.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ZMT.TO
VIDY.TO

Basic Materials

89.9%
6.3%

Industrials

10.1%
7.1%

Energy

3.7%
7.2%

Communication Services

-

4.4%

Consumer Cyclical

-

7.2%

Consumer Defensive

-

8.8%

Financial Services

-

40.7%

Healthcare

-

9.4%

Real Estate

-

1.3%

Technology

-

1.3%

Utilities

-

6.4%

Basic Materials

ZMT.TO
89.9%
VIDY.TO
6.3%

Industrials

ZMT.TO
10.1%
VIDY.TO
7.1%

Energy

ZMT.TO
3.7%
VIDY.TO
7.2%

Communication Services

ZMT.TO

-

VIDY.TO
4.4%

Consumer Cyclical

ZMT.TO

-

VIDY.TO
7.2%

Consumer Defensive

ZMT.TO

-

VIDY.TO
8.8%

Financial Services

ZMT.TO

-

VIDY.TO
40.7%

Healthcare

ZMT.TO

-

VIDY.TO
9.4%

Real Estate

ZMT.TO

-

VIDY.TO
1.3%

Technology

ZMT.TO

-

VIDY.TO
1.3%

Utilities

ZMT.TO

-

VIDY.TO
6.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZMT.TO vs. VIDY.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZMT.TO
ZMT.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
ZMT.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZMT.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZMT.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
ZMT.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZMT.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

VIDY.TO
VIDY.TO Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
VIDY.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VIDY.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
VIDY.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
VIDY.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
VIDY.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZMT.TO vs. VIDY.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO S&P/TSX Equal Weight Global Base Metals (CAD Hedged) (ZMT.TO) and Vanguard FTSE Developed ex North America High Dividend Yield Index ETF (VIDY.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ZMT.TOVIDY.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.73

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.38

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.63

2.66

+1.98

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.58

10.28

+4.30

ZMT.TO vs. VIDY.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZMT.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.84, which is higher than the VIDY.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZMT.TO and VIDY.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ZMT.TOVIDY.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.84

2.11

+0.73

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

1.13

-0.52

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.00

0.72

-0.72

Drawdowns

ZMT.TO vs. VIDY.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZMT.TO drawdown since its inception was -80.73%, which is greater than VIDY.TO's maximum drawdown of -31.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZMT.TO and VIDY.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZMT.TOVIDY.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-80.73%

-31.99%

-48.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.81%

-10.48%

-13.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.28%

-13.89%

-19.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.01%

-19.02%

-21.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-67.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.52%

-2.28%

-1.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-43.15%

-4.25%

-38.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.55%

2.70%

+4.85%

Volatility

ZMT.TO vs. VIDY.TO - Volatility Comparison

BMO S&P/TSX Equal Weight Global Base Metals (CAD Hedged) (ZMT.TO) has a higher volatility of 14.55% compared to Vanguard FTSE Developed ex North America High Dividend Yield Index ETF (VIDY.TO) at 4.18%. This indicates that ZMT.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VIDY.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZMT.TOVIDY.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.55%

4.18%

+10.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

31.86%

10.59%

+21.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

38.81%

13.21%

+25.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.74%

13.41%

+20.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.32%

16.44%

+16.88%

ZMT.TO vs. VIDY.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZMT.TO has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than VIDY.TO's 0.31% expense ratio.


Dividends

ZMT.TO vs. VIDY.TO - Dividend Comparison

ZMT.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.15%, less than VIDY.TO's 2.47% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VIDY.TO
Vanguard FTSE Developed ex North America High Dividend Yield Index ETF
2.47%2.80%3.59%3.89%4.37%3.28%3.34%3.36%0.93%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ZMT.TO
BMO S&P/TSX Equal Weight Global Base Metals (CAD Hedged)
0.15%0.21%0.34%0.87%1.46%2.82%1.03%2.34%3.95%1.29%1.24%1.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


ZMT.TO and VIDY.TO have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VIDY.TO is cheaper at 0.31% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VIDY.TO is cheaper with a 0.31% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for ZMT.TO.

ZMT.TO is categorized as Energy Equities, while VIDY.TO is Foreign Large Cap Equities. ZMT.TO tracks Solactive Equal Weight Global Base Metals Index Canadian Dollar Hedged, while VIDY.TO tracks FTSE Developed ex North America High Dividend Yield Index. They also come from different issuers: BMO and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.61% for ZMT.TO and 0.31% for VIDY.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZMT.TO and VIDY.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer