ZMT.TO vs. SPMO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ZMT.TO (BMO S&P/TSX Equal Weight Global Base Metals (CAD Hedged)) and SPMO (Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ZMT.TO is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Solactive Equal Weight Global Base Metals Index Canadian Dollar Hedged, while SPMO is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P 500 Momentum Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ZMT.TO returned 17.71%/yr vs 21.72%/yr for SPMO. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ZMT.TO charges 0.61%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for SPMO.

Performance

ZMT.TO vs. SPMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BMO S&P/TSX Equal Weight Global Base Metals (CAD Hedged) (ZMT.TO) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

ZMT.TO is traded in CAD, while SPMO is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SPMO values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZMT.TO achieves a 39.44% return, which is significantly higher than SPMO's 30.82% return. Over the past 10 years, ZMT.TO has underperformed SPMO with an annualized return of 17.71%, while SPMO has yielded a comparatively higher 21.72% annualized return.

ZMT.TO

• 1D: -3.52%
• 1M: 16.19%
• YTD: 39.44%
• 6M: 46.49%
• 1Y: 109.69%
• 3Y*: 42.46%
• 5Y*: 20.69%
• 10Y*: 17.71%

SPMO

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 16.60%
• YTD: 30.82%
• 6M: 28.84%
• 1Y: 46.55%
• 3Y*: 44.27%
• 5Y*: 27.61%
• 10Y*: 21.72%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZMT.TO vs. SPMO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ZMT.TO BMO S&P/TSX Equal Weight Global Base Metals (CAD Hedged)	39.44%	63.17%	15.30%	14.54%	-6.65%	11.04%	14.70%	15.82%	-34.17%	37.76%
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF	32.01%	20.78%	58.34%	14.97%	-4.07%	21.54%	26.09%	19.74%	7.49%	19.63%

Correlation

The correlation between ZMT.TO and SPMO is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.39
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.26
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.27
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.22
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 13, 2015	0.19

Over the past year, ZMT.TO and SPMO have become more correlated (0.39) than their long-term average of 0.19, meaning their price movements have been converging.

ZMT.TO vs. SPMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ZMT.TO	SPMO
Basic Materials	89.9%	1.6%
Industrials	10.1%	11.3%
Energy	3.7%	3.4%
Communication Services	-	9.2%
Consumer Cyclical	-	1.3%
Consumer Defensive	-	4.3%
Financial Services	-	5.9%
Healthcare	-	6.7%
Real Estate	-	1.0%
Technology	-	52.6%
Utilities	-	2.8%

Return for Risk

ZMT.TO vs. SPMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZMT.TO

ZMT.TO Risk / Return Rank: 78
ZMT.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
ZMT.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
ZMT.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 73
ZMT.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
ZMT.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 76

SPMO

SPMO Risk / Return Rank: 75
SPMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
SPMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
SPMO Omega Ratio Rank: 77
SPMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
SPMO Martin Ratio Rank: 73

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZMT.TO vs. SPMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO S&P/TSX Equal Weight Global Base Metals (CAD Hedged) (ZMT.TO) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ZMT.TO	SPMO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.84	2.72	+0.13
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.23	3.67	-0.44
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	1.49	-0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.63	3.65	+0.99
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.58	12.23	+2.34
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ZMT.TO vs. SPMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZMT.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.84, which is comparable to the SPMO Sharpe Ratio of 2.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZMT.TO and SPMO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ZMT.TO	SPMO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.84	2.72	+0.13
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.62	1.57	-0.95
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.53	1.14	-0.61
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.00	1.10	-1.10

Drawdowns

ZMT.TO vs. SPMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZMT.TO drawdown since its inception was -80.73%, which is greater than SPMO's maximum drawdown of -25.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZMT.TO and SPMO.

Drawdown Indicators

	ZMT.TO	SPMO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-80.73%	-25.58%	-55.15%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-23.81%	-12.82%	-10.99%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-33.28%	-20.26%	-13.02%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-41.01%	-20.69%	-20.32%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-67.51%	-25.58%	-41.93%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.52%	0.00%	-3.52%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-43.15%	-4.14%	-39.01%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.55%	3.82%	+3.73%

Volatility

ZMT.TO vs. SPMO - Volatility Comparison

BMO S&P/TSX Equal Weight Global Base Metals (CAD Hedged) (ZMT.TO) has a higher volatility of 14.55% compared to Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) at 7.29%. This indicates that ZMT.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ZMT.TO	SPMO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	14.55%	7.29%	+7.26%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	31.86%	13.95%	+17.91%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	38.81%	17.23%	+21.58%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	33.74%	17.71%	+16.03%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	33.32%	19.10%	+14.22%

ZMT.TO vs. SPMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZMT.TO has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than SPMO's 0.13% expense ratio.

Dividends

ZMT.TO vs. SPMO - Dividend Comparison

ZMT.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.15%, less than SPMO's 0.65% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF	0.65%	0.73%	0.48%	1.63%	1.66%	0.52%	1.27%	1.39%	1.05%	0.77%	1.94%	0.36%
ZMT.TO BMO S&P/TSX Equal Weight Global Base Metals (CAD Hedged)	0.15%	0.21%	0.34%	0.87%	1.46%	2.82%	1.03%	2.34%	3.95%	1.29%	1.24%	1.10%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ZMT.TO and SPMO in my portfolio?

ZMT.TO and SPMO have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ZMT.TO or SPMO?

On fees, SPMO is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ZMT.TO or SPMO?

SPMO is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for ZMT.TO.

What is the main difference between ZMT.TO and SPMO?

ZMT.TO is categorized as Energy Equities, while SPMO is Momentum. ZMT.TO tracks Solactive Equal Weight Global Base Metals Index Canadian Dollar Hedged, while SPMO tracks S&P 500 Momentum Index. They also come from different issuers: BMO and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.61% for ZMT.TO and 0.13% for SPMO.