ZMMK.TO vs. ZUH.TO
ZMMK.TO (BMO Money Market Fund ETF Series) and ZUH.TO (BMO Equal Weight US Health Care Hedged to CAD Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ZMMK.TO is a Money Market fund actively managed by BMO, while ZUH.TO is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the Solactive Equal Weight US Health Care Index CAD Hedged. ZMMK.TO is actively managed, while ZUH.TO is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, ZMMK.TO returned 3.73%/yr vs 2.83%/yr for ZUH.TO. Their -0.01 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. ZMMK.TO charges 0.13%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for ZUH.TO.
Performance
ZMMK.TO vs. ZUH.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZMMK.TO achieves a 1.36% return, which is significantly lower than ZUH.TO's 7.28% return.
ZMMK.TO
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.19%
- 6M
- 1.14%
- YTD
- 1.36%
- 1Y
- 2.46%
- 3Y*
- 3.73%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 3.42%
ZUH.TO
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- -0.65%
- 6M
- 6.88%
- YTD
- 7.28%
- 1Y
- 23.20%
- 3Y*
- 2.83%
- 5Y*
- -1.90%
- 10Y*
- 6.15%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.31%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA$11.59M | CA$10.74M | CA$11.95M | |
| CA$88.67K | CA$125.83K | CA$103.17K |
ZMMK.TO vs. ZUH.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZMMK.TO BMO Money Market Fund ETF Series | 1.36% | 2.77% | 4.94% | 4.86% | 1.99% | 0.04% |
ZUH.TO BMO Equal Weight US Health Care Hedged to CAD Index ETF | 7.28% | 6.34% | -3.86% | -1.73% | -15.65% | 6.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZMMK.TO and ZUH.TO is -0.10, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.10 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | -0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 2, 2021 | -0.01 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZMMK.TO vs. ZUH.TO — Risk / Return Rank
ZMMK.TO
ZUH.TO
ZMMK.TO vs. ZUH.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO Money Market Fund ETF Series (ZMMK.TO) and BMO Equal Weight US Health Care Hedged to CAD Index ETF (ZUH.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ZMMK.TO | ZUH.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +7.62 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +19.98 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 5.33 | 1.25 | +4.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 61.66 | 1.97 | +59.69 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 350.85 | 4.85 | +346.00 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ZMMK.TO vs. ZUH.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZMMK.TO drawdown since its inception was -0.16%, smaller than the maximum ZUH.TO drawdown of -34.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZMMK.TO and ZUH.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZMMK.TO | ZUH.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.16% | -34.21% | +34.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.04% | -11.59% | +11.55% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.08% | -22.23% | +22.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -34.21% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.21% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -13.53% | +13.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -9.26% | +9.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.01% | 4.70% | -4.69% |
Volatility
ZMMK.TO vs. ZUH.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for BMO Money Market Fund ETF Series (ZMMK.TO) is 0.05%, while BMO Equal Weight US Health Care Hedged to CAD Index ETF (ZUH.TO) has a volatility of 4.30%. This indicates that ZMMK.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZUH.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZMMK.TO | ZUH.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.05% | 4.30% | -4.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.17% | 12.03% | -11.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27% | 16.07% | -15.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.34% | 17.40% | -17.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.34% | 18.58% | -18.24% |
ZMMK.TO vs. ZUH.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZMMK.TO has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than ZUH.TO's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
ZMMK.TO vs. ZUH.TO - Dividend Comparison
ZMMK.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.45%, more than ZUH.TO's 0.51% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZMMK.TO BMO Money Market Fund ETF Series | 2.45% | 3.02% | 4.66% | 4.98% | 1.95% | 0.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ZUH.TO BMO Equal Weight US Health Care Hedged to CAD Index ETF | 0.51% | 0.55% | 0.74% | 0.73% | 0.43% | 0.12% | 0.37% | 0.33% | 0.33% | 0.36% | 0.98% | 0.48% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ZMMK.TO and ZUH.TO have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ZMMK.TO is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ZMMK.TO is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for ZUH.TO.
ZMMK.TO is categorized as Money Market, while ZUH.TO is Health & Biotech Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for ZMMK.TO and 0.39% for ZUH.TO.
Find the right allocation for ZMMK.TO and ZUH.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer