ZMMK.TO vs. ZST.TO
ZMMK.TO (BMO Money Market Fund ETF Series) and ZST.TO (BMO Ultra Short-Term Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ZMMK.TO is a Money Market fund actively managed by BMO, while ZST.TO is a Canadian Government Bonds fund actively managed by BMO. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, ZMMK.TO returned 3.86%/yr vs 3.86%/yr for ZST.TO. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ZMMK.TO charges 0.13%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for ZST.TO.
Performance
ZMMK.TO vs. ZST.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZMMK.TO achieves a 0.99% return, which is significantly lower than ZST.TO's 1.10% return.
ZMMK.TO
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.19%
- YTD
- 0.99%
- 6M
- 1.17%
- 1Y
- 2.50%
- 3Y*
- 3.86%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ZST.TO
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.29%
- YTD
- 1.10%
- 6M
- 0.26%
- 1Y
- 1.68%
- 3Y*
- 3.86%
- 5Y*
- 2.96%
- 10Y*
- 2.34%
ZMMK.TO vs. ZST.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZMMK.TO BMO Money Market Fund ETF Series | 0.99% | 2.77% | 4.94% | 4.86% | 1.99% | 0.04% |
ZST.TO BMO Ultra Short-Term Bond ETF | 1.10% | 2.03% | 5.16% | 5.33% | 1.19% | 0.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZMMK.TO and ZST.TO is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2021 | 0.11 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZMMK.TO vs. ZST.TO — Risk / Return Rank
ZMMK.TO
ZST.TO
ZMMK.TO vs. ZST.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO Money Market Fund ETF Series (ZMMK.TO) and BMO Ultra Short-Term Bond ETF (ZST.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ZMMK.TO | ZST.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +8.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +22.48 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 5.48 | 1.83 | +3.66 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 83.57 | 1.68 | +81.89 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 380.38 | 4.51 | +375.87 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ZMMK.TO | ZST.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.68 | 1.56 | +8.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 4.12 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 3.30 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 10.31 | 1.81 | +8.50 |
Drawdowns
ZMMK.TO vs. ZST.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZMMK.TO drawdown since its inception was -0.16%, smaller than the maximum ZST.TO drawdown of -1.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZMMK.TO and ZST.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZMMK.TO | ZST.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.16% | -1.06% | +0.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.03% | -1.01% | +0.98% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.08% | -1.01% | +0.93% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -1.01% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -1.06% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.00% | -0.13% | +0.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.01% | 0.37% | -0.36% |
Volatility
ZMMK.TO vs. ZST.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for BMO Money Market Fund ETF Series (ZMMK.TO) is 0.06%, while BMO Ultra Short-Term Bond ETF (ZST.TO) has a volatility of 0.07%. This indicates that ZMMK.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZST.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZMMK.TO | ZST.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.06% | 0.07% | -0.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.18% | 1.05% | -0.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26% | 1.08% | -0.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.34% | 0.72% | -0.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.34% | 0.71% | -0.37% |
ZMMK.TO vs. ZST.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZMMK.TO has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than ZST.TO's 0.17% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
ZMMK.TO vs. ZST.TO - Dividend Comparison
ZMMK.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.53%, which matches ZST.TO's 2.55% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZMMK.TO BMO Money Market Fund ETF Series | 2.53% | 3.02% | 4.66% | 4.98% | 1.95% | 0.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ZST.TO BMO Ultra Short-Term Bond ETF | 2.55% | 2.82% | 4.65% | 4.79% | 2.75% | 2.29% | 2.65% | 2.82% | 3.43% | 4.05% | 3.92% | 3.90% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ZMMK.TO and ZST.TO have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ZMMK.TO is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ZMMK.TO is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.17% for ZST.TO.
ZMMK.TO is categorized as Money Market, while ZST.TO is Canadian Government Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for ZMMK.TO and 0.17% for ZST.TO.
Find the right allocation for ZMMK.TO and ZST.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer