ZMMK.TO vs. MDA.TO

Last updated Jun 14, 2026

ZMMK.TO (BMO Money Market Fund ETF Series) is Money Market fund actively managed by BMO, while MDA.TO (MDA Space Ltd.) is a stock. Over the past 3 years, ZMMK.TO returned 3.84%/yr vs 83.01%/yr for MDA.TO. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

ZMMK.TO vs. MDA.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BMO Money Market Fund ETF Series (ZMMK.TO) and MDA Space Ltd. (MDA.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZMMK.TO achieves a 1.03% return, which is significantly lower than MDA.TO's 95.80% return.

ZMMK.TO

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 0.17%
• YTD: 1.03%
• 6M: 1.17%
• 1Y: 2.48%
• 3Y*: 3.84%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MDA.TO

• 1D: -8.57%
• 1M: -3.03%
• YTD: 95.80%
• 6M: 106.00%
• 1Y: 76.45%
• 3Y*: 83.01%
• 5Y*: 28.31%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZMMK.TO vs. MDA.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
ZMMK.TO BMO Money Market Fund ETF Series	1.03%	2.77%	4.94%	4.86%	1.99%	0.04%
MDA.TO MDA Space Ltd.	95.80%	-9.79%	156.34%	80.00%	-32.63%	-9.78%

Correlation

The correlation between ZMMK.TO and MDA.TO is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.03
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.04
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 2, 2021	0.08

Return for Risk

ZMMK.TO vs. MDA.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZMMK.TO

ZMMK.TO Risk / Return Rank: 99
ZMMK.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
ZMMK.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
ZMMK.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 99
ZMMK.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
ZMMK.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 100

MDA.TO

MDA.TO Risk / Return Rank: 73
MDA.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
MDA.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
MDA.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 75
MDA.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
MDA.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 69

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZMMK.TO vs. MDA.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO Money Market Fund ETF Series (ZMMK.TO) and MDA Space Ltd. (MDA.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ZMMK.TO	MDA.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	9.14	1.19	+7.95
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	22.01	1.72	+20.29
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	5.22	1.24	+3.97
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	62.17	1.43	+60.74
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	348.17	3.07	+345.10

ZMMK.TO vs. MDA.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZMMK.TO Sharpe Ratio is 9.14, which is higher than the MDA.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZMMK.TO and MDA.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ZMMK.TO vs. MDA.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZMMK.TO drawdown since its inception was -0.16%, smaller than the maximum MDA.TO drawdown of -68.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZMMK.TO and MDA.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	ZMMK.TO	MDA.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-0.16%	-68.33%	+68.17%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.04%	-53.77%	+53.73%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-0.08%	-53.77%	+53.69%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-65.68%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-22.30%	+22.30%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.00%	-30.65%	+30.65%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.01%	25.08%	-25.07%

Volatility

ZMMK.TO vs. MDA.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BMO Money Market Fund ETF Series (ZMMK.TO) is 0.08%, while MDA Space Ltd. (MDA.TO) has a volatility of 21.96%. This indicates that ZMMK.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MDA.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ZMMK.TO	MDA.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.08%	21.96%	-21.88%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.19%	45.64%	-45.45%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.27%	65.12%	-64.85%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	0.34%	49.43%	-49.09%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	0.34%	49.45%	-49.11%

Dividends

ZMMK.TO vs. MDA.TO - Dividend Comparison

ZMMK.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.53%, while MDA.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
MDA.TO MDA Space Ltd.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
ZMMK.TO BMO Money Market Fund ETF Series	2.53%	3.02%	4.66%	4.98%	1.95%	0.04%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ZMMK.TO and MDA.TO in my portfolio?

ZMMK.TO and MDA.TO have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.