PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZMMK.TO vs. HISU-U.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ZMMK.TO vs. HISU-U.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BMO Money Market Fund ETF Series (ZMMK.TO) and Evolve US High Interest Savings Account Fund (HISU-U.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

ZMMK.TO is traded in CAD, while HISU-U.TO is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the HISU-U.TO values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZMMK.TO achieves a 0.99% return, which is significantly lower than HISU-U.TO's 2.44% return.


ZMMK.TO

1D
0.04%
1M
0.19%
YTD
0.99%
6M
1.17%
1Y
2.50%
3Y*
3.86%
5Y*
10Y*

HISU-U.TO

1D
0.11%
1M
2.34%
YTD
2.44%
6M
0.91%
1Y
4.50%
3Y*
4.56%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZMMK.TO vs. HISU-U.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
ZMMK.TO
BMO Money Market Fund ETF Series
0.99%2.77%4.94%4.86%1.29%
HISU-U.TO
Evolve US High Interest Savings Account Fund
2.44%-1.75%12.72%1.60%4.39%

Correlation

The correlation between ZMMK.TO and HISU-U.TO is -0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 31, 2022

-0.04

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZMMK.TO vs. HISU-U.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZMMK.TO
ZMMK.TO Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
ZMMK.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZMMK.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZMMK.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
ZMMK.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZMMK.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank

HISU-U.TO
HISU-U.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
HISU-U.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HISU-U.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
HISU-U.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
HISU-U.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
HISU-U.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZMMK.TO vs. HISU-U.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO Money Market Fund ETF Series (ZMMK.TO) and Evolve US High Interest Savings Account Fund (HISU-U.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ZMMK.TOHISU-U.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+8.70

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+22.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

5.48

1.18

+4.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

83.57

1.13

+82.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

380.38

2.94

+377.44

ZMMK.TO vs. HISU-U.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZMMK.TO Sharpe Ratio is 9.68, which is higher than the HISU-U.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZMMK.TO and HISU-U.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ZMMK.TOHISU-U.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.68

0.99

+8.70

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

10.31

0.85

+9.46

Drawdowns

ZMMK.TO vs. HISU-U.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZMMK.TO drawdown since its inception was -0.16%, smaller than the maximum HISU-U.TO drawdown of -5.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZMMK.TO and HISU-U.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZMMK.TOHISU-U.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.16%

-5.49%

+5.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.03%

-4.01%

+3.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.08%

-5.49%

+5.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.58%

+0.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.00%

-1.78%

+1.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.01%

1.54%

-1.53%

Volatility

ZMMK.TO vs. HISU-U.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BMO Money Market Fund ETF Series (ZMMK.TO) is 0.06%, while Evolve US High Interest Savings Account Fund (HISU-U.TO) has a volatility of 0.86%. This indicates that ZMMK.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HISU-U.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZMMK.TOHISU-U.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.06%

0.86%

-0.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.18%

3.45%

-3.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26%

4.59%

-4.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.34%

5.94%

-5.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.34%

5.94%

-5.60%

ZMMK.TO vs. HISU-U.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZMMK.TO has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than HISU-U.TO's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ZMMK.TO vs. HISU-U.TO - Dividend Comparison

ZMMK.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.53%, less than HISU-U.TO's 2.74% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
HISU-U.TO
Evolve US High Interest Savings Account Fund
2.74%2.93%3.70%3.85%0.90%0.00%
ZMMK.TO
BMO Money Market Fund ETF Series
2.53%3.02%4.66%4.98%1.95%0.04%

Frequently Asked Questions


ZMMK.TO and HISU-U.TO have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ZMMK.TO is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ZMMK.TO is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for HISU-U.TO.

They also come from different issuers: BMO and Evolve. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for ZMMK.TO and 0.15% for HISU-U.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZMMK.TO and HISU-U.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer