ZMI.TO vs. ZIN.TO
ZMI.TO (BMO Monthly Income ETF) and ZIN.TO (BMO Equal Weight Industrials Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ZMI.TO is a Diversified Portfolio fund actively managed by BMO, while ZIN.TO is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Industrials Index. ZMI.TO is actively managed, while ZIN.TO is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ZMI.TO returned 6.57%/yr vs 13.42%/yr for ZIN.TO. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ZMI.TO charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.61%/yr for ZIN.TO.
Performance
ZMI.TO vs. ZIN.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZMI.TO achieves a 9.05% return, which is significantly lower than ZIN.TO's 22.77% return. Over the past 10 years, ZMI.TO has underperformed ZIN.TO with an annualized return of 6.57%, while ZIN.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 13.42% annualized return.
ZMI.TO
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 4.38%
- YTD
- 9.05%
- 6M
- 5.77%
- 1Y
- 15.92%
- 3Y*
- 12.30%
- 5Y*
- 7.74%
- 10Y*
- 6.57%
ZIN.TO
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 4.65%
- YTD
- 22.77%
- 6M
- 26.17%
- 1Y
- 43.28%
- 3Y*
- 20.97%
- 5Y*
- 13.57%
- 10Y*
- 13.42%
ZMI.TO vs. ZIN.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZMI.TO BMO Monthly Income ETF | 9.05% | 7.88% | 13.43% | 9.00% | -5.89% | 11.25% | 2.40% | 13.37% | -2.52% | 4.84% |
ZIN.TO BMO Equal Weight Industrials Index ETF | 22.77% | 16.68% | 16.33% | 19.36% | -8.06% | 17.86% | 6.62% | 22.67% | -6.61% | 17.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZMI.TO and ZIN.TO is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 26, 2012 | 0.45 |
ZMI.TO vs. ZIN.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ZMI.TO
ZIN.TO
Financial Services
Technology
-
Energy
Healthcare
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Industrials
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Financial Services
ZMI.TO
ZIN.TO
Technology
ZMI.TO
ZIN.TO
-
Energy
ZMI.TO
ZIN.TO
Healthcare
ZMI.TO
ZIN.TO
-
Communication Services
ZMI.TO
ZIN.TO
-
Consumer Defensive
ZMI.TO
ZIN.TO
-
Industrials
ZMI.TO
ZIN.TO
Utilities
ZMI.TO
ZIN.TO
Consumer Cyclical
ZMI.TO
ZIN.TO
Basic Materials
ZMI.TO
ZIN.TO
Real Estate
ZMI.TO
ZIN.TO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZMI.TO vs. ZIN.TO — Risk / Return Rank
ZMI.TO
ZIN.TO
ZMI.TO vs. ZIN.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO Monthly Income ETF (ZMI.TO) and BMO Equal Weight Industrials Index ETF (ZIN.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ZMI.TO | ZIN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.72 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.90 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.52 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.36 | 5.37 | -2.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.99 | 19.31 | -8.33 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ZMI.TO | ZIN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.25 | 2.97 | -0.72 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.05 | 0.82 | +0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.74 | 0.75 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.77 | 0.76 | +0.01 |
Drawdowns
ZMI.TO vs. ZIN.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZMI.TO drawdown since its inception was -26.65%, smaller than the maximum ZIN.TO drawdown of -44.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZMI.TO and ZIN.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZMI.TO | ZIN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.65% | -44.01% | +17.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.75% | -8.10% | +3.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.81% | -22.39% | +13.58% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -12.65% | -23.11% | +10.46% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -26.65% | -44.01% | +17.36% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.17% | -0.12% | -0.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.12% | -6.14% | +4.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.45% | 2.25% | -0.80% |
Volatility
ZMI.TO vs. ZIN.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for BMO Monthly Income ETF (ZMI.TO) is 2.27%, while BMO Equal Weight Industrials Index ETF (ZIN.TO) has a volatility of 3.38%. This indicates that ZMI.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZIN.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZMI.TO | ZIN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.27% | 3.38% | -1.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.80% | 11.39% | -5.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.10% | 14.67% | -7.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.44% | 16.70% | -9.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.87% | 18.04% | -9.17% |
ZMI.TO vs. ZIN.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZMI.TO has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than ZIN.TO's 0.61% expense ratio.
Dividends
ZMI.TO vs. ZIN.TO - Dividend Comparison
ZMI.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.93%, more than ZIN.TO's 0.95% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZIN.TO BMO Equal Weight Industrials Index ETF | 0.95% | 1.22% | 1.41% | 1.67% | 2.01% | 1.84% | 2.10% | 2.31% | 1.81% | 1.35% | 1.91% | 2.24% |
ZMI.TO BMO Monthly Income ETF | 3.93% | 4.54% | 4.68% | 4.94% | 4.49% | 3.71% | 4.21% | 4.24% | 4.58% | 4.06% | 3.89% | 3.89% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ZMI.TO and ZIN.TO have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ZMI.TO is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ZMI.TO is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for ZIN.TO.
ZMI.TO is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while ZIN.TO is Industrials Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for ZMI.TO and 0.61% for ZIN.TO.
Find the right allocation for ZMI.TO and ZIN.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer