ZIN.TO vs. ZUQ.TO
ZIN.TO (BMO Equal Weight Industrials Index ETF) and ZUQ.TO (BMO MSCI USA High Quality Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ZIN.TO is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Industrials Index, while ZUQ.TO is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA Quality Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ZIN.TO returned 13.42%/yr vs 16.38%/yr for ZUQ.TO. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ZIN.TO charges 0.61%/yr vs 0.33%/yr for ZUQ.TO.
Performance
ZIN.TO vs. ZUQ.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZIN.TO achieves a 22.77% return, which is significantly higher than ZUQ.TO's 9.39% return. Over the past 10 years, ZIN.TO has underperformed ZUQ.TO with an annualized return of 13.42%, while ZUQ.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 16.38% annualized return.
ZIN.TO
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 4.65%
- YTD
- 22.77%
- 6M
- 26.17%
- 1Y
- 43.28%
- 3Y*
- 20.97%
- 5Y*
- 13.57%
- 10Y*
- 13.42%
ZUQ.TO
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- 5.91%
- YTD
- 9.39%
- 6M
- 3.18%
- 1Y
- 19.10%
- 3Y*
- 20.39%
- 5Y*
- 15.26%
- 10Y*
- 16.38%
ZIN.TO vs. ZUQ.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZIN.TO BMO Equal Weight Industrials Index ETF | 22.77% | 16.68% | 16.33% | 19.36% | -8.06% | 17.86% | 6.62% | 22.67% | -6.61% | 17.73% |
ZUQ.TO BMO MSCI USA High Quality Index ETF | 9.39% | 5.78% | 34.02% | 33.24% | -18.33% | 26.40% | 19.92% | 31.74% | 4.70% | 16.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZIN.TO and ZUQ.TO is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 14, 2014 | 0.33 |
ZIN.TO vs. ZUQ.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ZIN.TO
ZUQ.TO
Industrials
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Utilities
Basic Materials
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
Technology
-
Industrials
ZIN.TO
ZUQ.TO
Energy
ZIN.TO
ZUQ.TO
Consumer Cyclical
ZIN.TO
ZUQ.TO
Utilities
ZIN.TO
ZUQ.TO
Basic Materials
ZIN.TO
ZUQ.TO
Real Estate
ZIN.TO
ZUQ.TO
-
Financial Services
ZIN.TO
ZUQ.TO
Communication Services
ZIN.TO
-
ZUQ.TO
Consumer Defensive
ZIN.TO
-
ZUQ.TO
Healthcare
ZIN.TO
-
ZUQ.TO
Technology
ZIN.TO
-
ZUQ.TO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZIN.TO vs. ZUQ.TO — Risk / Return Rank
ZIN.TO
ZUQ.TO
ZIN.TO vs. ZUQ.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO Equal Weight Industrials Index ETF (ZIN.TO) and BMO MSCI USA High Quality Index ETF (ZUQ.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ZIN.TO | ZUQ.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.72 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.52 | 1.30 | +0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.37 | 1.81 | +3.55 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.31 | 5.87 | +13.45 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ZIN.TO | ZUQ.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.97 | 1.56 | +1.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 | 0.94 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.75 | 0.94 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.76 | 0.94 | -0.18 |
Drawdowns
ZIN.TO vs. ZUQ.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZIN.TO drawdown since its inception was -44.01%, which is greater than ZUQ.TO's maximum drawdown of -26.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZIN.TO and ZUQ.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZIN.TO | ZUQ.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.01% | -26.94% | -17.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.10% | -10.57% | +2.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.39% | -17.93% | -4.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.11% | -26.94% | +3.83% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.01% | -26.94% | -17.07% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.12% | -0.10% | -0.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.14% | -4.60% | -1.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.25% | 3.26% | -1.01% |
Volatility
ZIN.TO vs. ZUQ.TO - Volatility Comparison
BMO Equal Weight Industrials Index ETF (ZIN.TO) has a higher volatility of 3.38% compared to BMO MSCI USA High Quality Index ETF (ZUQ.TO) at 2.31%. This indicates that ZIN.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZUQ.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZIN.TO | ZUQ.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.38% | 2.31% | +1.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.39% | 9.60% | +1.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.67% | 12.29% | +2.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.70% | 16.35% | +0.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.04% | 17.52% | +0.52% |
ZIN.TO vs. ZUQ.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZIN.TO has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than ZUQ.TO's 0.33% expense ratio.
Dividends
ZIN.TO vs. ZUQ.TO - Dividend Comparison
ZIN.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.95%, more than ZUQ.TO's 0.43% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZIN.TO BMO Equal Weight Industrials Index ETF | 0.95% | 1.22% | 1.41% | 1.67% | 2.01% | 1.84% | 2.10% | 2.31% | 1.81% | 1.35% | 1.91% | 2.24% |
ZUQ.TO BMO MSCI USA High Quality Index ETF | 0.43% | 0.46% | 0.57% | 0.86% | 0.99% | 0.80% | 0.96% | 0.96% | 1.07% | 1.16% | 1.00% | 0.88% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ZIN.TO and ZUQ.TO have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ZUQ.TO is cheaper at 0.33% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ZUQ.TO is cheaper with a 0.33% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for ZIN.TO.
ZIN.TO is categorized as Industrials Equities, while ZUQ.TO is Large Cap Blend Equities. ZIN.TO tracks Solactive Equal Weight Canada Industrials Index, while ZUQ.TO tracks MSCI USA Quality Index. Their fees differ too: 0.61% for ZIN.TO and 0.33% for ZUQ.TO.
Find the right allocation for ZIN.TO and ZUQ.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer