ZIN.TO vs. ZSP.TO
ZIN.TO (BMO Equal Weight Industrials Index ETF) and ZSP.TO (BMO S&P 500 Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ZIN.TO is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Industrials Index, while ZSP.TO is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ZIN.TO returned 13.42%/yr vs 15.98%/yr for ZSP.TO. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ZIN.TO charges 0.61%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for ZSP.TO.
Performance
ZIN.TO vs. ZSP.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZIN.TO achieves a 22.77% return, which is significantly higher than ZSP.TO's 12.15% return. Over the past 10 years, ZIN.TO has underperformed ZSP.TO with an annualized return of 13.42%, while ZSP.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 15.98% annualized return.
ZIN.TO
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 4.65%
- YTD
- 22.77%
- 6M
- 26.17%
- 1Y
- 43.28%
- 3Y*
- 20.97%
- 5Y*
- 13.57%
- 10Y*
- 13.42%
ZSP.TO
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- 7.18%
- YTD
- 12.15%
- 6M
- 10.04%
- 1Y
- 28.96%
- 3Y*
- 23.44%
- 5Y*
- 16.74%
- 10Y*
- 15.98%
ZIN.TO vs. ZSP.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZIN.TO BMO Equal Weight Industrials Index ETF | 22.77% | 16.68% | 16.33% | 19.36% | -8.06% | 17.86% | 6.62% | 22.67% | -6.61% | 17.73% |
ZSP.TO BMO S&P 500 Index ETF | 12.15% | 12.02% | 35.07% | 23.30% | -12.68% | 27.53% | 15.61% | 24.69% | 3.24% | 13.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZIN.TO and ZSP.TO is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 27, 2012 | 0.37 |
ZIN.TO vs. ZSP.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ZIN.TO
ZSP.TO
Industrials
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Utilities
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Financial Services
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
Technology
-
Industrials
ZIN.TO
ZSP.TO
Energy
ZIN.TO
ZSP.TO
Consumer Cyclical
ZIN.TO
ZSP.TO
Utilities
ZIN.TO
ZSP.TO
Basic Materials
ZIN.TO
ZSP.TO
Real Estate
ZIN.TO
ZSP.TO
Financial Services
ZIN.TO
ZSP.TO
Communication Services
ZIN.TO
-
ZSP.TO
Consumer Defensive
ZIN.TO
-
ZSP.TO
Healthcare
ZIN.TO
-
ZSP.TO
Technology
ZIN.TO
-
ZSP.TO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZIN.TO vs. ZSP.TO — Risk / Return Rank
ZIN.TO
ZSP.TO
ZIN.TO vs. ZSP.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO Equal Weight Industrials Index ETF (ZIN.TO) and BMO S&P 500 Index ETF (ZSP.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ZIN.TO | ZSP.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.44 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.52 | 1.47 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.37 | 3.38 | +1.99 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.31 | 12.70 | +6.62 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ZIN.TO | ZSP.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.97 | 2.53 | +0.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 | 1.13 | -0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.75 | 0.98 | -0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.76 | 1.15 | -0.40 |
Drawdowns
ZIN.TO vs. ZSP.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZIN.TO drawdown since its inception was -44.01%, which is greater than ZSP.TO's maximum drawdown of -26.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZIN.TO and ZSP.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZIN.TO | ZSP.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.01% | -26.94% | -17.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.10% | -8.61% | +0.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.39% | -18.95% | -3.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.11% | -22.25% | -0.86% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.01% | -26.94% | -17.07% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.12% | -0.29% | +0.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.14% | -3.34% | -2.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.25% | 2.29% | -0.04% |
Volatility
ZIN.TO vs. ZSP.TO - Volatility Comparison
BMO Equal Weight Industrials Index ETF (ZIN.TO) has a higher volatility of 3.38% compared to BMO S&P 500 Index ETF (ZSP.TO) at 3.14%. This indicates that ZIN.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZSP.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZIN.TO | ZSP.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.38% | 3.14% | +0.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.39% | 8.65% | +2.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.67% | 11.53% | +3.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.70% | 14.97% | +1.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.04% | 16.36% | +1.68% |
ZIN.TO vs. ZSP.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZIN.TO has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than ZSP.TO's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
ZIN.TO vs. ZSP.TO - Dividend Comparison
ZIN.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.95%, more than ZSP.TO's 0.75% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZIN.TO BMO Equal Weight Industrials Index ETF | 0.95% | 1.22% | 1.41% | 1.67% | 2.01% | 1.84% | 2.10% | 2.31% | 1.81% | 1.35% | 1.91% | 2.24% |
ZSP.TO BMO S&P 500 Index ETF | 0.75% | 0.82% | 0.94% | 1.33% | 1.44% | 1.15% | 1.44% | 1.47% | 1.63% | 1.63% | 2.20% | 1.53% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ZIN.TO and ZSP.TO have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ZSP.TO is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ZSP.TO is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for ZIN.TO.
ZIN.TO is categorized as Industrials Equities, while ZSP.TO is S&P 500. ZIN.TO tracks Solactive Equal Weight Canada Industrials Index, while ZSP.TO tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.61% for ZIN.TO and 0.09% for ZSP.TO.
Find the right allocation for ZIN.TO and ZSP.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer