ZMAR vs. ZJAN

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

ZMAR (Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr March) and ZJAN (Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr January) are both Defined Outcome funds from Innovator. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, ZMAR returned 7.54% vs 7.47% for ZJAN. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.79% expense ratio.

Performance

ZMAR vs. ZJAN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr March (ZMAR) and Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr January (ZJAN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZMAR achieves a 2.63% return, which is significantly higher than ZJAN's 2.25% return.

ZMAR

• 1D: -0.03%
• 1M: 0.63%
• YTD: 2.63%
• 6M: 3.22%
• 1Y: 7.54%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ZJAN

• 1D: -0.02%
• 1M: 0.63%
• YTD: 2.25%
• 6M: 2.81%
• 1Y: 7.47%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZMAR vs. ZJAN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ZMAR Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr March	2.63%	5.95%
ZJAN Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr January	2.25%	6.31%

Correlation

The correlation between ZMAR and ZJAN is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.75
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 4, 2025	0.77

The correlation between ZMAR and ZJAN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

ZMAR vs. ZJAN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZMAR

ZMAR Risk / Return Rank: 94
ZMAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
ZMAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
ZMAR Omega Ratio Rank: 96
ZMAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
ZMAR Martin Ratio Rank: 95

ZJAN

ZJAN Risk / Return Rank: 94
ZJAN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
ZJAN Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
ZJAN Omega Ratio Rank: 96
ZJAN Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
ZJAN Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZMAR vs. ZJAN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr March (ZMAR) and Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr January (ZJAN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ZMAR	ZJAN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.57	3.69	-0.12
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	5.83	5.68	+0.14
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.83	1.83	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.26	5.51	-0.25
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	30.04	28.66	+1.39
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ZMAR vs. ZJAN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZMAR Sharpe Ratio is 3.57, which is comparable to the ZJAN Sharpe Ratio of 3.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZMAR and ZJAN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ZMAR	ZJAN	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.57	3.69	-0.12
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.27	2.17	+0.10

Drawdowns

ZMAR vs. ZJAN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZMAR drawdown since its inception was -2.30%, smaller than the maximum ZJAN drawdown of -3.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZMAR and ZJAN.

Drawdown Indicators

	ZMAR	ZJAN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-2.30%	-3.20%	+0.90%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.44%	-1.36%	-0.08%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.08%	-0.07%	-0.01%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.22%	-0.35%	+0.13%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.25%	0.26%	-0.01%

Volatility

ZMAR vs. ZJAN - Volatility Comparison

Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr March (ZMAR) and Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr January (ZJAN) have volatilities of 0.37% and 0.38%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ZMAR	ZJAN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.37%	0.38%	-0.01%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.57%	1.45%	+0.12%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.12%	2.03%	+0.09%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.04%	2.97%	+0.07%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.04%	2.97%	+0.07%

ZMAR vs. ZJAN - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both ZMAR and ZJAN have an expense ratio of 0.79%.

Dividends

ZMAR vs. ZJAN - Dividend Comparison

Neither ZMAR nor ZJAN has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ZMAR and ZJAN in my portfolio?

ZMAR and ZJAN have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ZMAR or ZJAN?

ZJAN has higher volatility (0.38%) compared to ZMAR (0.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ZMAR dropped -2.30% vs ZJAN's -3.20%.

Which ETF is better, ZMAR or ZJAN?

On 1-year performance, ZMAR leads with 7.54% vs 7.47% for ZJAN. Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ZMAR or ZJAN?

Over the 1-year period, ZMAR has performed better with a 7.54% return vs 7.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ZMAR or ZJAN?

ZMAR and ZJAN have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ZMAR or ZJAN?

ZMAR and ZJAN have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ZJAN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.69 vs 3.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.