ZMAR vs. NVDO

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

ZMAR (Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr March) and NVDO (Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated NVDA Monthly ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ZMAR charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.77%/yr for NVDO.

Performance

ZMAR vs. NVDO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr March (ZMAR) and Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated NVDA Monthly ETF (NVDO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZMAR achieves a 2.28% return, which is significantly lower than NVDO's 16.35% return.

ZMAR

• 1D: 0.01%
• 1M: -0.20%
• YTD: 2.28%
• 6M: 2.25%
• 1Y: 6.48%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

NVDO

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 1.13%
• YTD: 16.35%
• 6M: 18.26%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZMAR vs. NVDO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ZMAR Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr March	2.28%	2.53%
NVDO Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated NVDA Monthly ETF	16.35%	10.05%

Correlation

The correlation between ZMAR and NVDO is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 13, 2025	0.51

Return for Risk

ZMAR vs. NVDO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZMAR

ZMAR Risk / Return Rank: 93
ZMAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
ZMAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
ZMAR Omega Ratio Rank: 95
ZMAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
ZMAR Martin Ratio Rank: 95

NVDO

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZMAR vs. NVDO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr March (ZMAR) and Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated NVDA Monthly ETF (NVDO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ZMAR	NVDO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.02	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.79	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.67	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.52	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	24.81	—	—

Drawdowns

ZMAR vs. NVDO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZMAR drawdown since its inception was -2.89%, smaller than the maximum NVDO drawdown of -16.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZMAR and NVDO.

Drawdown Indicators

	ZMAR	NVDO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-2.89%	-16.25%	+13.36%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.44%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.42%	-4.73%	+4.31%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.32%	-4.97%	+4.65%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.26%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ZMAR	NVDO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.70%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.68%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.15%	31.98%	-29.83%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.08%	31.98%	-28.90%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.08%	31.98%	-28.90%

ZMAR vs. NVDO - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZMAR has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than NVDO's 0.77% expense ratio.

Dividends

ZMAR vs. NVDO - Dividend Comparison

ZMAR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NVDO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.32%.

Position	TTM	2025
NVDO Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated NVDA Monthly ETF	14.32%	16.66%
ZMAR Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr March	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ZMAR and NVDO in my portfolio?

ZMAR and NVDO have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ZMAR or NVDO?

On fees, NVDO is cheaper at 0.77% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ZMAR or NVDO?

NVDO is cheaper with a 0.77% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for ZMAR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ZMAR or NVDO?

NVDO has the higher dividend yield at 14.32%, compared with 0.00% for ZMAR.

What is the main difference between ZMAR and NVDO?

They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for ZMAR and 0.77% for NVDO.