PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
ZLH.TO vs. ZLE.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

ZLH.TO vs. ZLE.TO

Last updated Jul 25, 2026
Documentation

ZLH.TO (BMO Low Volatility US Equity Hedged to CAD ETF) and ZLE.TO (BMO Low Volatility Emerging Markets Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ZLH.TO is a Low Volatility fund actively managed by BMO, while ZLE.TO is a Emerging Markets Equities fund actively managed by BMO. Both are actively managed. Over the past 10 years, ZLH.TO returned 7.42%/yr vs 4.92%/yr for ZLE.TO. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ZLH.TO charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.51%/yr for ZLE.TO.

Performance

ZLH.TO vs. ZLE.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BMO Low Volatility US Equity Hedged to CAD ETF (ZLH.TO) and BMO Low Volatility Emerging Markets Equity ETF (ZLE.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZLH.TO achieves a 10.18% return, which is significantly lower than ZLE.TO's 24.38% return. Over the past 10 years, ZLH.TO has outperformed ZLE.TO with an annualized return of 7.42%, while ZLE.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 4.92% annualized return.

ZLH.TO

1D
1.09%
1M
2.54%
6M
7.42%
YTD
10.18%
1Y
8.31%
3Y*
8.05%
5Y*
6.57%
10Y*
7.42%
ALL TIME*
8.66%

ZLE.TO

1D
-1.02%
1M
-6.34%
6M
18.49%
YTD
24.38%
1Y
33.84%
3Y*
19.78%
5Y*
8.88%
10Y*
4.92%
ALL TIME*
5.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)

ZLE.TO

BMO Low Volatility Emerging Markets Equity ETF
CA$98.00KCA$111.56KCA$124.80K

ZLH.TO

BMO Low Volatility US Equity Hedged to CAD ETF
CA$212.50KCA$216.28KCA$179.19K

ZLH.TO vs. ZLE.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ZLH.TO
BMO Low Volatility US Equity Hedged to CAD ETF		10.18%5.90%10.95%-2.11%0.20%22.07%2.34%25.20%-1.85%11.93%
ZLE.TO
BMO Low Volatility Emerging Markets Equity ETF		24.38%18.71%15.26%6.15%-11.98%-6.43%-1.08%11.00%-7.15%14.79%

Correlation

The correlation between ZLH.TO and ZLE.TO is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.05

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.08

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 17, 2016

0.13

The correlation between ZLH.TO and ZLE.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.01 (1 year) to 0.13 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ZLH.TO vs. ZLE.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
ZLH.TO
ZLE.TO

Technology

19.6%
40.5%

Utilities

19.6%
3.3%

Healthcare

17.4%
6.5%

Consumer Defensive

11.3%
6.7%

Financial Services

11.1%
17.2%

Industrials

7.8%
6.5%

Communication Services

4.3%
9.3%

Consumer Cyclical

3.9%
5.0%

Real Estate

3.9%
0.1%

Basic Materials

0.7%
1.1%

Energy

0.4%
3.8%

Technology

ZLH.TO
19.6%
ZLE.TO
40.5%

Utilities

ZLH.TO
19.6%
ZLE.TO
3.3%

Healthcare

ZLH.TO
17.4%
ZLE.TO
6.5%

Consumer Defensive

ZLH.TO
11.3%
ZLE.TO
6.7%

Financial Services

ZLH.TO
11.1%
ZLE.TO
17.2%

Industrials

ZLH.TO
7.8%
ZLE.TO
6.5%

Communication Services

ZLH.TO
4.3%
ZLE.TO
9.3%

Consumer Cyclical

ZLH.TO
3.9%
ZLE.TO
5.0%

Real Estate

ZLH.TO
3.9%
ZLE.TO
0.1%

Basic Materials

ZLH.TO
0.7%
ZLE.TO
1.1%

Energy

ZLH.TO
0.4%
ZLE.TO
3.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

BMO Low Volatility US Equity Hedged to CAD ETF

BMO Low Volatility Emerging Markets Equity ETF

Often compared with ZLH.TO:
ZLH.TO vs. ESGY.TOZLH.TO vs. MULC.TOZLH.TO vs. FLUS.TOZLH.TO vs. TULV.TOZLH.TO vs. XTOT.TOZLH.TO vs. ZLU.TOZLH.TO vs. FCQH.TO
Often compared with ZLE.TO:
ZLE.TO vs. XEM.TOZLE.TO vs. VEE.TOZLE.TO vs. XEC.TOZLE.TO vs. XMM.TOZLE.TO vs. XSEM.TOZLE.TO vs. ZEM.TOZLE.TO vs. ZEQT.TO

Return for Risk

ZLH.TO vs. ZLE.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
ZLH.TO
ZLH.TO Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
ZLH.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZLH.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZLH.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
ZLH.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZLH.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
ZLE.TO
ZLE.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
ZLE.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZLE.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZLE.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
ZLE.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZLE.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZLH.TO vs. ZLE.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO Low Volatility US Equity Hedged to CAD ETF (ZLH.TO) and BMO Low Volatility Emerging Markets Equity ETF (ZLE.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

ZLH.TOZLE.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
0.77
1.86

-1.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.06
2.43

-1.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.35

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.14

3.05

-1.91

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.73

10.21

-7.49

ZLH.TO vs. ZLE.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZLH.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.77, which is lower than the ZLE.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZLH.TO and ZLE.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ZLH.TO vs. ZLE.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZLH.TO drawdown since its inception was -33.34%, which is greater than ZLE.TO's maximum drawdown of -31.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZLH.TO and ZLE.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

ZLH.TOZLE.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.34%

-31.71%

-1.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.35%

-11.16%

+3.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.92%

-11.16%

+1.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.66%

-25.10%

+10.44%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.34%

-31.71%

-1.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.14%

-9.69%

+8.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.89%

-9.39%

+5.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.06%

3.32%

-0.26%

Volatility

ZLH.TO vs. ZLE.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BMO Low Volatility US Equity Hedged to CAD ETF (ZLH.TO) is 4.01%, while BMO Low Volatility Emerging Markets Equity ETF (ZLE.TO) has a volatility of 8.40%. This indicates that ZLH.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZLE.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

ZLH.TOZLE.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.01%

8.40%

-4.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.93%

16.15%

-8.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.84%

18.27%

-7.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.24%

13.92%

-1.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.85%

14.57%

-0.72%

ZLH.TO vs. ZLE.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZLH.TO has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than ZLE.TO's 0.51% expense ratio.

Dividends

ZLH.TO vs. ZLE.TO - Dividend Comparison

ZLH.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.72%, less than ZLE.TO's 2.51% yield.

PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
ZLE.TO
BMO Low Volatility Emerging Markets Equity ETF		2.51%3.13%3.61%3.54%3.62%2.21%2.11%1.82%2.13%1.39%0.76%
ZLH.TO
BMO Low Volatility US Equity Hedged to CAD ETF		1.72%1.92%2.25%2.45%2.12%1.84%1.95%1.55%2.00%1.93%2.02%

Frequently Asked Questions

ZLH.TO and ZLE.TO have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ZLH.TO is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ZLH.TO is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.51% for ZLE.TO.

ZLH.TO is categorized as Low Volatility, while ZLE.TO is Emerging Markets Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for ZLH.TO and 0.51% for ZLE.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZLH.TO and ZLE.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer