ZLE.TO vs. XMM.TO
ZLE.TO (BMO Low Volatility Emerging Markets Equity ETF) and XMM.TO (iShares MSCI Min Vol Emerging Markets Index ETF) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, ZLE.TO returned 6.17%/yr vs 6.93%/yr for XMM.TO. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ZLE.TO charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.42%/yr for XMM.TO.
Performance
ZLE.TO vs. XMM.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZLE.TO achieves a 34.50% return, which is significantly higher than XMM.TO's 21.91% return. Over the past 10 years, ZLE.TO has underperformed XMM.TO with an annualized return of 6.17%, while XMM.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 6.93% annualized return.
ZLE.TO
- 1D
- 1.49%
- 1M
- 6.37%
- YTD
- 34.50%
- 6M
- 31.59%
- 1Y
- 47.27%
- 3Y*
- 24.48%
- 5Y*
- 10.16%
- 10Y*
- 6.17%
XMM.TO
- 1D
- 0.40%
- 1M
- 3.04%
- YTD
- 21.91%
- 6M
- 21.98%
- 1Y
- 26.94%
- 3Y*
- 16.24%
- 5Y*
- 8.25%
- 10Y*
- 6.93%
ZLE.TO vs. XMM.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZLE.TO BMO Low Volatility Emerging Markets Equity ETF | 34.50% | 18.71% | 15.26% | 6.15% | -11.98% | -6.43% | -1.08% | 11.00% | -7.15% | 14.79% |
XMM.TO iShares MSCI Min Vol Emerging Markets Index ETF | 21.91% | 7.65% | 16.66% | 4.10% | -7.83% | 3.95% | 4.32% | 1.36% | 2.38% | 18.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZLE.TO and XMM.TO is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 17, 2016 | 0.46 |
The correlation between ZLE.TO and XMM.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.44 (5 years) to 0.59 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZLE.TO vs. XMM.TO — Risk / Return Rank
ZLE.TO
XMM.TO
ZLE.TO vs. XMM.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO Low Volatility Emerging Markets Equity ETF (ZLE.TO) and iShares MSCI Min Vol Emerging Markets Index ETF (XMM.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ZLE.TO | XMM.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.99 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.54 | 1.41 | +0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.83 | 3.09 | +2.74 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.60 | 10.59 | +8.00 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ZLE.TO vs. XMM.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZLE.TO drawdown since its inception was -31.71%, which is greater than XMM.TO's maximum drawdown of -22.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZLE.TO and XMM.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZLE.TO | XMM.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.71% | -22.07% | -9.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.15% | -8.76% | +0.61% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.91% | -9.94% | -0.97% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.74% | -15.42% | -10.32% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.71% | -22.07% | -9.64% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.34% | -2.18% | -0.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.40% | -5.19% | -4.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.55% | 2.55% | 0.00% |
Volatility
ZLE.TO vs. XMM.TO - Volatility Comparison
BMO Low Volatility Emerging Markets Equity ETF (ZLE.TO) has a higher volatility of 8.77% compared to iShares MSCI Min Vol Emerging Markets Index ETF (XMM.TO) at 7.70%. This indicates that ZLE.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XMM.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZLE.TO | XMM.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.77% | 7.70% | +1.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.43% | 13.36% | +1.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.54% | 14.37% | +2.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.52% | 10.84% | +2.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.42% | 12.15% | +2.27% |
ZLE.TO vs. XMM.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZLE.TO has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than XMM.TO's 0.42% expense ratio.
Dividends
ZLE.TO vs. XMM.TO - Dividend Comparison
ZLE.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.33%, more than XMM.TO's 1.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XMM.TO iShares MSCI Min Vol Emerging Markets Index ETF | 1.91% | 2.37% | 2.95% | 2.55% | 1.55% | 1.91% | 2.09% | 2.44% | 2.23% | 2.09% | 2.35% | 2.16% |
ZLE.TO BMO Low Volatility Emerging Markets Equity ETF | 2.33% | 3.13% | 3.61% | 3.54% | 3.62% | 2.21% | 2.11% | 1.82% | 2.13% | 1.39% | 0.76% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ZLE.TO and XMM.TO have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XMM.TO is cheaper at 0.42% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XMM.TO is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for ZLE.TO.
They also come from different issuers: BMO and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for ZLE.TO and 0.42% for XMM.TO.
Find the right allocation for ZLE.TO and XMM.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer