PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZLH.TO vs. ESGY.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ZLH.TO vs. ESGY.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BMO Low Volatility US Equity Hedged to CAD ETF (ZLH.TO) and BMO MSCI USA Selection Equity Index ETF (ESGY.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZLH.TO achieves a 10.70% return, which is significantly lower than ESGY.TO's 12.54% return.


ZLH.TO

1D
0.45%
1M
1.77%
6M
9.80%
YTD
10.70%
1Y
10.45%
3Y*
9.07%
5Y*
7.04%
10Y*
7.49%

ESGY.TO

1D
-0.09%
1M
3.00%
6M
9.73%
YTD
12.54%
1Y
26.13%
3Y*
22.66%
5Y*
15.48%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZLH.TO vs. ESGY.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
ZLH.TO
BMO Low Volatility US Equity Hedged to CAD ETF
10.70%5.90%10.95%-2.11%0.20%22.07%-0.67%
ESGY.TO
BMO MSCI USA Selection Equity Index ETF
12.54%13.67%33.83%26.54%-15.46%30.67%11.27%

Correlation

The correlation between ZLH.TO and ESGY.TO is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.16

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 21, 2020

0.27

The correlation between ZLH.TO and ESGY.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.16 (1 year) to 0.27 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ZLH.TO vs. ESGY.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ZLH.TO
ESGY.TO

Utilities

20.7%
1.0%

Technology

18.7%
39.6%

Healthcare

17.8%
9.7%

Consumer Defensive

12.4%
4.0%

Financial Services

11.7%
10.0%

Industrials

6.3%
7.7%

Real Estate

3.4%
2.1%

Consumer Cyclical

3.2%
8.5%

Communication Services

3.0%
13.7%

Basic Materials

2.2%
2.0%

Energy

0.7%
1.9%

Utilities

ZLH.TO
20.7%
ESGY.TO
1.0%

Technology

ZLH.TO
18.7%
ESGY.TO
39.6%

Healthcare

ZLH.TO
17.8%
ESGY.TO
9.7%

Consumer Defensive

ZLH.TO
12.4%
ESGY.TO
4.0%

Financial Services

ZLH.TO
11.7%
ESGY.TO
10.0%

Industrials

ZLH.TO
6.3%
ESGY.TO
7.7%

Real Estate

ZLH.TO
3.4%
ESGY.TO
2.1%

Consumer Cyclical

ZLH.TO
3.2%
ESGY.TO
8.5%

Communication Services

ZLH.TO
3.0%
ESGY.TO
13.7%

Basic Materials

ZLH.TO
2.2%
ESGY.TO
2.0%

Energy

ZLH.TO
0.7%
ESGY.TO
1.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZLH.TO vs. ESGY.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZLH.TO
ZLH.TO Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
ZLH.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZLH.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZLH.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
ZLH.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZLH.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

ESGY.TO
ESGY.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
ESGY.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESGY.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESGY.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
ESGY.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESGY.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZLH.TO vs. ESGY.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO Low Volatility US Equity Hedged to CAD ETF (ZLH.TO) and BMO MSCI USA Selection Equity Index ETF (ESGY.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ZLH.TOESGY.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.37

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.43

2.47

-1.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.47

8.95

-5.49

ZLH.TO vs. ESGY.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZLH.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.98, which is lower than the ESGY.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZLH.TO and ESGY.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ZLH.TO vs. ESGY.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZLH.TO drawdown since its inception was -33.34%, which is greater than ESGY.TO's maximum drawdown of -26.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZLH.TO and ESGY.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZLH.TOESGY.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.34%

-26.36%

-6.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.35%

-10.62%

+3.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.17%

-20.83%

+10.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.66%

-22.89%

+8.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.67%

-0.92%

+0.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.90%

-5.25%

+1.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.02%

2.93%

+0.09%

Volatility

ZLH.TO vs. ESGY.TO - Volatility Comparison

BMO Low Volatility US Equity Hedged to CAD ETF (ZLH.TO) has a higher volatility of 4.01% compared to BMO MSCI USA Selection Equity Index ETF (ESGY.TO) at 3.81%. This indicates that ZLH.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ESGY.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZLH.TOESGY.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.01%

3.81%

+0.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.61%

9.94%

-2.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.69%

12.82%

-2.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.25%

15.61%

-3.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.83%

16.83%

-3.00%

Dividends

ZLH.TO vs. ESGY.TO - Dividend Comparison

ZLH.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.71%, more than ESGY.TO's 0.61% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
ESGY.TO
BMO MSCI USA Selection Equity Index ETF
0.61%0.66%0.79%1.16%1.34%1.12%1.44%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ZLH.TO
BMO Low Volatility US Equity Hedged to CAD ETF
1.71%1.92%2.25%2.45%2.12%1.84%1.95%1.55%2.00%1.93%2.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


ZLH.TO and ESGY.TO have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZLH.TO and ESGY.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer