ZLH.TO vs. ESGY.TO
ZLH.TO (BMO Low Volatility US Equity Hedged to CAD ETF) and ESGY.TO (BMO MSCI USA Selection Equity Index ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds from BMO. Over the past 5 years, ZLH.TO returned 7.04%/yr vs 15.48%/yr for ESGY.TO. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ZLH.TO vs. ESGY.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZLH.TO achieves a 10.70% return, which is significantly lower than ESGY.TO's 12.54% return.
ZLH.TO
- 1D
- 0.45%
- 1M
- 1.77%
- 6M
- 9.80%
- YTD
- 10.70%
- 1Y
- 10.45%
- 3Y*
- 9.07%
- 5Y*
- 7.04%
- 10Y*
- 7.49%
ESGY.TO
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- 3.00%
- 6M
- 9.73%
- YTD
- 12.54%
- 1Y
- 26.13%
- 3Y*
- 22.66%
- 5Y*
- 15.48%
- 10Y*
- —
ZLH.TO vs. ESGY.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZLH.TO BMO Low Volatility US Equity Hedged to CAD ETF | 10.70% | 5.90% | 10.95% | -2.11% | 0.20% | 22.07% | -0.67% |
ESGY.TO BMO MSCI USA Selection Equity Index ETF | 12.54% | 13.67% | 33.83% | 26.54% | -15.46% | 30.67% | 11.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZLH.TO and ESGY.TO is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 21, 2020 | 0.27 |
The correlation between ZLH.TO and ESGY.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.16 (1 year) to 0.27 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
ZLH.TO vs. ESGY.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ZLH.TO
ESGY.TO
Utilities
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Financial Services
Industrials
Real Estate
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Energy
Utilities
ZLH.TO
ESGY.TO
Technology
ZLH.TO
ESGY.TO
Healthcare
ZLH.TO
ESGY.TO
Consumer Defensive
ZLH.TO
ESGY.TO
Financial Services
ZLH.TO
ESGY.TO
Industrials
ZLH.TO
ESGY.TO
Real Estate
ZLH.TO
ESGY.TO
Consumer Cyclical
ZLH.TO
ESGY.TO
Communication Services
ZLH.TO
ESGY.TO
Basic Materials
ZLH.TO
ESGY.TO
Energy
ZLH.TO
ESGY.TO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZLH.TO vs. ESGY.TO — Risk / Return Rank
ZLH.TO
ESGY.TO
ZLH.TO vs. ESGY.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO Low Volatility US Equity Hedged to CAD ETF (ZLH.TO) and BMO MSCI USA Selection Equity Index ETF (ESGY.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ZLH.TO | ESGY.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.65 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.37 | -0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.43 | 2.47 | -1.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.47 | 8.95 | -5.49 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ZLH.TO vs. ESGY.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZLH.TO drawdown since its inception was -33.34%, which is greater than ESGY.TO's maximum drawdown of -26.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZLH.TO and ESGY.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZLH.TO | ESGY.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.34% | -26.36% | -6.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.35% | -10.62% | +3.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.17% | -20.83% | +10.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.66% | -22.89% | +8.23% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.34% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.67% | -0.92% | +0.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.90% | -5.25% | +1.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.02% | 2.93% | +0.09% |
Volatility
ZLH.TO vs. ESGY.TO - Volatility Comparison
BMO Low Volatility US Equity Hedged to CAD ETF (ZLH.TO) has a higher volatility of 4.01% compared to BMO MSCI USA Selection Equity Index ETF (ESGY.TO) at 3.81%. This indicates that ZLH.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ESGY.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZLH.TO | ESGY.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.01% | 3.81% | +0.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.61% | 9.94% | -2.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.69% | 12.82% | -2.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.25% | 15.61% | -3.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.83% | 16.83% | -3.00% |
Dividends
ZLH.TO vs. ESGY.TO - Dividend Comparison
ZLH.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.71%, more than ESGY.TO's 0.61% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESGY.TO BMO MSCI USA Selection Equity Index ETF | 0.61% | 0.66% | 0.79% | 1.16% | 1.34% | 1.12% | 1.44% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ZLH.TO BMO Low Volatility US Equity Hedged to CAD ETF | 1.71% | 1.92% | 2.25% | 2.45% | 2.12% | 1.84% | 1.95% | 1.55% | 2.00% | 1.93% | 2.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ZLH.TO and ESGY.TO have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for ZLH.TO and ESGY.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer