PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZLD.TO vs. DRMD.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ZLD.TO vs. DRMD.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BMO Low Volatility International Equity Hedged to CAD ETF (ZLD.TO) and Desjardins RI Developed ex-USA ex-Canada - Net-Zero Emissions Pathway ETF (DRMD.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZLD.TO achieves a 5.87% return, which is significantly lower than DRMD.TO's 11.41% return.


ZLD.TO

1D
0.32%
1M
3.66%
6M
4.78%
YTD
5.87%
1Y
7.06%
3Y*
10.27%
5Y*
6.48%
10Y*
6.55%

DRMD.TO

1D
-0.44%
1M
-0.94%
6M
6.36%
YTD
11.41%
1Y
22.63%
3Y*
18.01%
5Y*
11.15%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZLD.TO vs. DRMD.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
ZLD.TO
BMO Low Volatility International Equity Hedged to CAD ETF
5.87%9.63%11.11%11.37%-6.68%12.56%8.62%
DRMD.TO
Desjardins RI Developed ex-USA ex-Canada - Net-Zero Emissions Pathway ETF
11.41%27.57%11.54%13.94%-8.20%9.85%20.29%

Correlation

The correlation between ZLD.TO and DRMD.TO is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.32

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 30, 2020

0.25

The correlation between ZLD.TO and DRMD.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.25 (all time) to 0.43 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZLD.TO vs. DRMD.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZLD.TO
ZLD.TO Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
ZLD.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZLD.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZLD.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
ZLD.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZLD.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

DRMD.TO
DRMD.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
DRMD.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DRMD.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
DRMD.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
DRMD.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
DRMD.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZLD.TO vs. DRMD.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO Low Volatility International Equity Hedged to CAD ETF (ZLD.TO) and Desjardins RI Developed ex-USA ex-Canada - Net-Zero Emissions Pathway ETF (DRMD.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ZLD.TODRMD.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.82

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.30

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.00

1.95

-0.95

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.14

7.78

-5.64

ZLD.TO vs. DRMD.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZLD.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.84, which is lower than the DRMD.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZLD.TO and DRMD.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ZLD.TO vs. DRMD.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZLD.TO drawdown since its inception was -28.97%, which is greater than DRMD.TO's maximum drawdown of -23.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZLD.TO and DRMD.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZLD.TODRMD.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.97%

-23.39%

-5.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.09%

-11.65%

+4.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.47%

-14.40%

+6.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.02%

-23.39%

+8.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.67%

-3.18%

+1.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.68%

-4.02%

+0.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.31%

2.92%

+0.39%

Volatility

ZLD.TO vs. DRMD.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BMO Low Volatility International Equity Hedged to CAD ETF (ZLD.TO) is 1.91%, while Desjardins RI Developed ex-USA ex-Canada - Net-Zero Emissions Pathway ETF (DRMD.TO) has a volatility of 3.23%. This indicates that ZLD.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DRMD.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZLD.TODRMD.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.91%

3.23%

-1.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.36%

11.26%

-4.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.43%

13.64%

-5.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.97%

13.87%

-3.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.82%

13.87%

-1.05%

Dividends

ZLD.TO vs. DRMD.TO - Dividend Comparison

ZLD.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.18%, while DRMD.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
DRMD.TO
Desjardins RI Developed ex-USA ex-Canada - Net-Zero Emissions Pathway ETF
0.00%0.00%12.27%1.86%2.45%2.04%1.64%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ZLD.TO
BMO Low Volatility International Equity Hedged to CAD ETF
2.18%2.29%2.45%2.66%2.62%2.31%2.62%2.17%2.36%2.23%1.96%

Frequently Asked Questions


ZLD.TO and DRMD.TO have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

They also come from different issuers: BMO and Desjardins.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZLD.TO and DRMD.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer