ZLD.TO vs. ZXM.TO

Last updated Jul 1, 2026

ZLD.TO (BMO Low Volatility International Equity Hedged to CAD ETF) and ZXM.TO (CI Morningstar International Momentum Index ETF Common Units CAD Hedged) are both exchange-traded funds - ZLD.TO is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund managed by BMO, while ZXM.TO is a Momentum fund tracking the Morningstar Developed Markets ex-North America Target Momentum Index. Over the past 10 years, ZLD.TO returned 6.30%/yr vs 13.78%/yr for ZXM.TO. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ZLD.TO charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.67%/yr for ZXM.TO.

Performance

ZLD.TO vs. ZXM.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BMO Low Volatility International Equity Hedged to CAD ETF (ZLD.TO) and CI Morningstar International Momentum Index ETF Common Units CAD Hedged (ZXM.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZLD.TO achieves a 2.40% return, which is significantly lower than ZXM.TO's 16.90% return. Over the past 10 years, ZLD.TO has underperformed ZXM.TO with an annualized return of 6.30%, while ZXM.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 13.78% annualized return.

ZLD.TO

• 1D: -0.20%
• 1M: 1.10%
• YTD: 2.40%
• 6M: 2.20%
• 1Y: 2.90%
• 3Y*: 8.86%
• 5Y*: 6.03%
• 10Y*: 6.30%

ZXM.TO

• 1D: 1.04%
• 1M: 2.75%
• YTD: 16.90%
• 6M: 16.80%
• 1Y: 37.39%
• 3Y*: 26.26%
• 5Y*: 13.94%
• 10Y*: 13.78%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZLD.TO vs. ZXM.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ZLD.TO BMO Low Volatility International Equity Hedged to CAD ETF	2.40%	9.63%	11.11%	11.37%	-6.68%	12.56%	-5.85%	17.60%	0.60%	12.86%
ZXM.TO CI Morningstar International Momentum Index ETF Common Units CAD Hedged	16.90%	35.74%	21.42%	14.21%	-20.62%	25.67%	16.23%	30.39%	-17.00%	28.15%

Correlation

The correlation between ZLD.TO and ZXM.TO is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.17
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.28
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.30
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.37
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 10, 2016	0.39

Over the past year, the correlation between ZLD.TO and ZXM.TO has dropped to 0.17 - well below their long-term average of 0.39, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

ZLD.TO vs. ZXM.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZLD.TO

ZLD.TO Risk / Return Rank: 13
ZLD.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 14
ZLD.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 13
ZLD.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 12
ZLD.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 14
ZLD.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 13

ZXM.TO

ZXM.TO Risk / Return Rank: 86
ZXM.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
ZXM.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
ZXM.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 91
ZXM.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
ZXM.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 82

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZLD.TO vs. ZXM.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO Low Volatility International Equity Hedged to CAD ETF (ZLD.TO) and CI Morningstar International Momentum Index ETF Common Units CAD Hedged (ZXM.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ZLD.TO	ZXM.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.35	2.42	-2.07
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.54	3.43	-2.89
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.06	1.50	-0.43
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.41	3.63	-3.22
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.89	13.93	-13.05

ZLD.TO vs. ZXM.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZLD.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.35, which is lower than the ZXM.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZLD.TO and ZXM.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ZLD.TO vs. ZXM.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZLD.TO drawdown since its inception was -28.97%, smaller than the maximum ZXM.TO drawdown of -35.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZLD.TO and ZXM.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	ZLD.TO	ZXM.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-28.97%	-35.22%	+6.25%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.09%	-10.35%	+3.26%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-7.47%	-12.74%	+5.27%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-15.02%	-26.93%	+11.91%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-28.97%	-35.22%	+6.25%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.89%	-2.11%	-2.78%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.69%	-6.42%	+2.73%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.27%	2.69%	+0.58%

Volatility

ZLD.TO vs. ZXM.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BMO Low Volatility International Equity Hedged to CAD ETF (ZLD.TO) is 1.67%, while CI Morningstar International Momentum Index ETF Common Units CAD Hedged (ZXM.TO) has a volatility of 6.21%. This indicates that ZLD.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZXM.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ZLD.TO	ZXM.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.67%	6.21%	-4.54%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.28%	14.01%	-7.73%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.33%	15.56%	-7.23%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.98%	16.21%	-6.23%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.85%	16.58%	-3.73%

ZLD.TO vs. ZXM.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZLD.TO has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than ZXM.TO's 0.67% expense ratio.

Dividends

ZLD.TO vs. ZXM.TO - Dividend Comparison

ZLD.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.26%, more than ZXM.TO's 1.86% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ZLD.TO BMO Low Volatility International Equity Hedged to CAD ETF	2.26%	2.29%	2.45%	2.66%	2.62%	2.31%	2.62%	2.17%	2.36%	2.23%	1.96%	0.00%
ZXM.TO CI Morningstar International Momentum Index ETF Common Units CAD Hedged	1.86%	2.39%	2.97%	3.57%	5.50%	1.58%	0.86%	1.19%	1.48%	0.88%	1.19%	1.11%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ZLD.TO and ZXM.TO in my portfolio?

ZLD.TO and ZXM.TO have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ZLD.TO or ZXM.TO?

On fees, ZLD.TO is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ZLD.TO or ZXM.TO?

ZLD.TO is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.67% for ZXM.TO.

What is the main difference between ZLD.TO and ZXM.TO?

ZLD.TO is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while ZXM.TO is Momentum. They also come from different issuers: BMO and CI Global Asset Management. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for ZLD.TO and 0.67% for ZXM.TO.