PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZK vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ZK vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ZEEKR Intelligent Technology Holding Ltd (ZK) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


ZK

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
0.00%
6M
0.11%
1Y
0.22%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

VOO

1D
-0.70%
1M
5.04%
YTD
10.91%
6M
10.93%
1Y
28.04%
3Y*
22.44%
5Y*
13.90%
10Y*
15.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZK vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
ZK
ZEEKR Intelligent Technology Holding Ltd
0.00%-5.81%0.42%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
10.91%17.82%13.66%

Correlation

The correlation between ZK and VOO is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 13, 2024

0.21

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZK vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZK
ZK Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
ZK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZK Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZK Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
ZK Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZK Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZK vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ZEEKR Intelligent Technology Holding Ltd (ZK) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ZKVOODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

1.43

-0.41

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.02

3.16

-3.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.02

14.73

-14.70

ZK vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZK Sharpe Ratio is 0.01, which is lower than the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZK and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ZKVOODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.01

2.39

-2.38

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.04

0.89

-0.93

Drawdowns

ZK vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZK drawdown since its inception was -53.44%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZK and VOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZKVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.44%

-33.99%

-19.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.61%

-8.90%

-6.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.61%

-0.70%

-17.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.31%

-3.69%

-16.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.29%

1.91%

+9.38%

Volatility

ZK vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ZEEKR Intelligent Technology Holding Ltd (ZK) is 0.00%, while Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) has a volatility of 2.84%. This indicates that ZK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZKVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.00%

2.84%

-2.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.32%

8.90%

+0.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.36%

11.80%

+9.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

65.21%

16.81%

+48.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

65.21%

18.01%

+47.20%

Dividends

ZK vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

ZK has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.03%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%
ZK
ZEEKR Intelligent Technology Holding Ltd
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ZK and VOO have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VOO has higher volatility (2.84%) compared to ZK (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ZK dropped -53.44% vs VOO's -33.99%.

VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 0.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZK and VOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer