ZJUN vs. PAUG

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr June (ZJUN) and Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - August (PAUG).

ZJUN and PAUG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ZJUN is an actively managed fund by Innovator. It was launched on May 30, 2025. PAUG is a passively managed fund by Innovator that tracks the performance of the Cboe S&P 500 15% Buffer Protect August Series Index. It was launched on Aug 1, 2019.

Performance

ZJUN vs. PAUG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr June (ZJUN) and Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - August (PAUG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

ZJUN vs. PAUG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ZJUN Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr June	0.45%	3.95%
PAUG Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - August	-0.92%	10.05%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZJUN achieves a 0.45% return, which is significantly higher than PAUG's -0.92% return.

ZJUN

• 1D: 0.17%
• 1M: -0.20%
• YTD: 0.45%
• 6M: 1.60%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PAUG

• 1D: 0.30%
• 1M: -1.70%
• YTD: -0.92%
• 6M: 0.78%
• 1Y: 13.15%
• 3Y*: 13.25%
• 5Y*: 8.14%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZJUN vs. PAUG - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both ZJUN and PAUG have an expense ratio of 0.79%.

ZJUN

Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr June

PAUG

Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - August

Return for Risk

ZJUN vs. PAUG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PAUG

PAUG Risk / Return Rank: 76
PAUG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
PAUG Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
PAUG Omega Ratio Rank: 81
PAUG Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
PAUG Martin Ratio Rank: 85

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZJUN vs. PAUG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr June (ZJUN) and Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - August (PAUG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ZJUN	PAUG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.30	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.94	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.80	0.81	+2.00

Correlation

The correlation between ZJUN and PAUG is 0.80, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

ZJUN vs. PAUG - Dividend Comparison

Neither ZJUN nor PAUG has paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
ZJUN Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr June	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PAUG Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - August	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	1.33%

Drawdowns

ZJUN vs. PAUG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZJUN drawdown since its inception was -1.08%, smaller than the maximum PAUG drawdown of -17.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZJUN and PAUG.

Drawdown Indicators

	ZJUN	PAUG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-1.08%	-17.88%	+16.80%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-7.15%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-11.76%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.26%	-2.01%	+1.75%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.09%	-1.85%	+1.76%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.25%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ZJUN	PAUG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	2.93%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	4.42%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.91%	10.14%	-8.23%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	1.91%	8.67%	-6.76%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	1.91%	10.71%	-8.80%