ZJUL vs. NVDO
ZJUL (Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr July) and NVDO (Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated NVDA Monthly ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ZJUL charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.77%/yr for NVDO.
Performance
ZJUL vs. NVDO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZJUL achieves a 2.58% return, which is significantly lower than NVDO's 20.98% return.
ZJUL
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.57%
- YTD
- 2.58%
- 6M
- 2.94%
- 1Y
- 7.33%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NVDO
- 1D
- 1.80%
- 1M
- 17.25%
- YTD
- 20.98%
- 6M
- 29.71%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ZJUL vs. NVDO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ZJUL Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr July | 2.58% | 2.09% |
NVDO Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated NVDA Monthly ETF | 20.98% | 11.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZJUL and NVDO is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 14, 2025 | 0.41 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZJUL vs. NVDO — Risk / Return Rank
ZJUL
NVDO
ZJUL vs. NVDO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr July (ZJUL) and Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated NVDA Monthly ETF (NVDO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ZJUL | NVDO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.60 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.13 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 27.92 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ZJUL | NVDO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.82 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.60 | 1.39 | +0.20 |
Drawdowns
ZJUL vs. NVDO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZJUL drawdown since its inception was -5.51%, smaller than the maximum NVDO drawdown of -16.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZJUL and NVDO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZJUL | NVDO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.51% | -16.25% | +10.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.43% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.93% | +0.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.47% | -4.97% | +4.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.26% | — | — |
Volatility
ZJUL vs. NVDO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZJUL | NVDO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.24% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.82% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.61% | 31.91% | -29.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.64% | 31.91% | -27.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.64% | 31.91% | -27.27% |
ZJUL vs. NVDO - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZJUL has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than NVDO's 0.77% expense ratio.
Dividends
ZJUL vs. NVDO - Dividend Comparison
ZJUL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NVDO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.77%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
NVDO Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated NVDA Monthly ETF | 13.77% | 16.66% |
ZJUL Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr July | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ZJUL and NVDO have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NVDO is cheaper at 0.77% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NVDO is cheaper with a 0.77% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for ZJUL.
NVDO has the higher dividend yield at 13.77%, compared with 0.00% for ZJUL.
They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for ZJUL and 0.77% for NVDO.
Find the right allocation for ZJUL and NVDO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer