PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZJPN.TO vs. EWJV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ZJPN.TO vs. EWJV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BMO Japan Index ETF (ZJPN.TO) and iShares MSCI Japan Value ETF (EWJV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

ZJPN.TO is traded in CAD, while EWJV is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the EWJV values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with ZJPN.TO having a 16.83% return and EWJV slightly lower at 16.44%.


ZJPN.TO

1D
0.94%
1M
8.50%
YTD
16.83%
6M
16.80%
1Y
31.72%
3Y*
19.11%
5Y*
10Y*

EWJV

1D
0.68%
1M
8.61%
YTD
16.44%
6M
18.42%
1Y
38.08%
3Y*
25.68%
5Y*
16.76%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZJPN.TO vs. EWJV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
ZJPN.TO
BMO Japan Index ETF
16.83%19.62%16.50%16.10%-2.46%
EWJV
iShares MSCI Japan Value ETF
16.44%27.82%21.18%20.88%-1.40%

Correlation

The correlation between ZJPN.TO and EWJV is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 28, 2022

0.68

The correlation between ZJPN.TO and EWJV shifts across timeframes, from 0.68 (all time) to 0.83 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ZJPN.TO vs. EWJV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ZJPN.TO
EWJV

Industrials

26.2%
23.9%

Technology

17.6%
9.4%

Financial Services

15.9%
30.2%

Consumer Cyclical

12.7%
13.8%

Communication Services

8.6%
6.3%

Healthcare

6.1%
4.3%

Consumer Defensive

3.9%
3.5%

Basic Materials

3.6%
2.0%

Real Estate

3.2%
2.9%

Utilities

1.3%
1.6%

Energy

0.9%
2.1%

Industrials

ZJPN.TO
26.2%
EWJV
23.9%

Technology

ZJPN.TO
17.6%
EWJV
9.4%

Financial Services

ZJPN.TO
15.9%
EWJV
30.2%

Consumer Cyclical

ZJPN.TO
12.7%
EWJV
13.8%

Communication Services

ZJPN.TO
8.6%
EWJV
6.3%

Healthcare

ZJPN.TO
6.1%
EWJV
4.3%

Consumer Defensive

ZJPN.TO
3.9%
EWJV
3.5%

Basic Materials

ZJPN.TO
3.6%
EWJV
2.0%

Real Estate

ZJPN.TO
3.2%
EWJV
2.9%

Utilities

ZJPN.TO
1.3%
EWJV
1.6%

Energy

ZJPN.TO
0.9%
EWJV
2.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZJPN.TO vs. EWJV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZJPN.TO
ZJPN.TO Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
ZJPN.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZJPN.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZJPN.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
ZJPN.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZJPN.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

EWJV
EWJV Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
EWJV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EWJV Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
EWJV Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
EWJV Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
EWJV Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZJPN.TO vs. EWJV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO Japan Index ETF (ZJPN.TO) and iShares MSCI Japan Value ETF (EWJV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ZJPN.TOEWJVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.38

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.51

2.72

-0.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.78

8.53

+0.25

ZJPN.TO vs. EWJV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZJPN.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.67, which is comparable to the EWJV Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZJPN.TO and EWJV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ZJPN.TOEWJVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.67

2.06

-0.39

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.89

0.79

+0.10

Drawdowns

ZJPN.TO vs. EWJV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZJPN.TO drawdown since its inception was -17.03%, smaller than the maximum EWJV drawdown of -25.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZJPN.TO and EWJV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZJPN.TOEWJVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.03%

-25.67%

+8.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.72%

-14.08%

+1.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.45%

-15.09%

+0.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-2.00%

+2.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.36%

-5.45%

+1.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.63%

4.51%

-0.88%

Volatility

ZJPN.TO vs. EWJV - Volatility Comparison

BMO Japan Index ETF (ZJPN.TO) has a higher volatility of 4.75% compared to iShares MSCI Japan Value ETF (EWJV) at 3.97%. This indicates that ZJPN.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EWJV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZJPN.TOEWJVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.75%

3.97%

+0.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.75%

14.26%

+0.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.10%

18.62%

+0.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.03%

16.34%

+0.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.03%

16.87%

+0.16%

ZJPN.TO vs. EWJV - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZJPN.TO has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than EWJV's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

ZJPN.TO vs. EWJV - Dividend Comparison

ZJPN.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.18%, less than EWJV's 4.66% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
EWJV
iShares MSCI Japan Value ETF
4.66%5.35%4.10%3.32%2.71%2.46%1.96%4.29%
ZJPN.TO
BMO Japan Index ETF
1.18%1.45%1.79%2.05%1.97%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ZJPN.TO and EWJV have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, EWJV is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EWJV is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for ZJPN.TO.

ZJPN.TO tracks Solactive GBS Japan Large & Mid Cap Index, while EWJV tracks MSCI Japan Value Index. They also come from different issuers: BMO and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for ZJPN.TO and 0.15% for EWJV.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZJPN.TO and EWJV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer