PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZJG.TO vs. VALT-U.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ZJG.TO vs. VALT-U.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BMO Junior Gold Index ETF (ZJG.TO) and CI Gold Bullion ETF (US$ Series) (VALT-U.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

ZJG.TO is traded in CAD, while VALT-U.TO is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the VALT-U.TO values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZJG.TO achieves a -10.61% return, which is significantly lower than VALT-U.TO's -2.68% return.


ZJG.TO

1D
-1.09%
1M
-13.92%
6M
-20.57%
YTD
-10.61%
1Y
54.35%
3Y*
44.80%
5Y*
26.50%
10Y*
12.14%

VALT-U.TO

1D
1.69%
1M
-5.37%
6M
-10.32%
YTD
-2.68%
1Y
26.04%
3Y*
30.79%
5Y*
20.48%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZJG.TO vs. VALT-U.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
ZJG.TO
BMO Junior Gold Index ETF
-10.61%154.66%36.44%6.11%-0.89%-12.20%
VALT-U.TO
CI Gold Bullion ETF (US$ Series)
-2.68%57.87%36.96%10.73%5.35%-0.94%

Correlation

The correlation between ZJG.TO and VALT-U.TO is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.54

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 14, 2021

0.42

Over the past year, ZJG.TO and VALT-U.TO have become more correlated (0.73) than their long-term average of 0.42, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZJG.TO vs. VALT-U.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZJG.TO
ZJG.TO Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
ZJG.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZJG.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZJG.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
ZJG.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZJG.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

VALT-U.TO
VALT-U.TO Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
VALT-U.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VALT-U.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
VALT-U.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
VALT-U.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
VALT-U.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZJG.TO vs. VALT-U.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO Junior Gold Index ETF (ZJG.TO) and CI Gold Bullion ETF (US$ Series) (VALT-U.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ZJG.TOVALT-U.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.20

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.45

0.72

+0.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.21

1.69

+1.52

ZJG.TO vs. VALT-U.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZJG.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.11, which is higher than the VALT-U.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZJG.TO and VALT-U.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ZJG.TO vs. VALT-U.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZJG.TO drawdown since its inception was -81.59%, which is greater than VALT-U.TO's maximum drawdown of -36.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZJG.TO and VALT-U.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZJG.TOVALT-U.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-81.59%

-36.22%

-45.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-37.55%

-36.22%

-1.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-37.55%

-36.22%

-1.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.63%

-36.22%

-5.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-36.91%

-35.13%

-1.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-48.95%

-5.79%

-43.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.96%

15.28%

+1.68%

Volatility

ZJG.TO vs. VALT-U.TO - Volatility Comparison

BMO Junior Gold Index ETF (ZJG.TO) has a higher volatility of 13.19% compared to CI Gold Bullion ETF (US$ Series) (VALT-U.TO) at 7.03%. This indicates that ZJG.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VALT-U.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZJG.TOVALT-U.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.19%

7.03%

+6.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

41.16%

38.73%

+2.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

49.44%

41.29%

+8.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

37.17%

23.09%

+14.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

38.19%

22.46%

+15.73%

Dividends

ZJG.TO vs. VALT-U.TO - Dividend Comparison

ZJG.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%, while VALT-U.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
VALT-U.TO
CI Gold Bullion ETF (US$ Series)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ZJG.TO
BMO Junior Gold Index ETF
0.13%0.12%0.68%0.90%0.83%0.36%

Frequently Asked Questions


ZJG.TO and VALT-U.TO have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

They also come from different issuers: BMO and CI.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZJG.TO and VALT-U.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer