VALT-U.TO vs. CGL-C.TO
VALT-U.TO (CI Gold Bullion ETF (US$ Series)) and CGL-C.TO (iShares Gold Bullion ETF) are both Gold funds. VALT-U.TO is actively managed, while CGL-C.TO is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, VALT-U.TO returned 17.66%/yr vs 17.09%/yr for CGL-C.TO. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
VALT-U.TO vs. CGL-C.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
VALT-U.TO is traded in USD, while CGL-C.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the CGL-C.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VALT-U.TO achieves a -6.39% return, which is significantly higher than CGL-C.TO's -7.38% return.
VALT-U.TO
- 1D
- 0.73%
- 1M
- -11.06%
- YTD
- -6.39%
- 6M
- -7.30%
- 1Y
- 22.84%
- 3Y*
- 28.29%
- 5Y*
- 17.66%
- 10Y*
- —
CGL-C.TO
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- -11.88%
- YTD
- -7.38%
- 6M
- -8.02%
- 1Y
- 20.99%
- 3Y*
- 27.03%
- 5Y*
- 17.09%
- 10Y*
- 11.05%
VALT-U.TO vs. CGL-C.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VALT-U.TO CI Gold Bullion ETF (US$ Series) | -6.39% | 65.42% | 26.27% | 13.43% | -0.93% | -1.30% |
CGL-C.TO iShares Gold Bullion ETF | -7.38% | 62.99% | 26.68% | 12.82% | -0.22% | -2.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between VALT-U.TO and CGL-C.TO is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 14, 2021 | 0.55 |
Over the past year, VALT-U.TO and CGL-C.TO have become more correlated (0.85) than their long-term average of 0.55, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VALT-U.TO vs. CGL-C.TO — Risk / Return Rank
VALT-U.TO
CGL-C.TO
VALT-U.TO vs. CGL-C.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CI Gold Bullion ETF (US$ Series) (VALT-U.TO) and iShares Gold Bullion ETF (CGL-C.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VALT-U.TO | CGL-C.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.16 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.60 | 0.81 | -0.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.61 | 2.16 | -0.55 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VALT-U.TO vs. CGL-C.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VALT-U.TO drawdown since its inception was -38.65%, smaller than the maximum CGL-C.TO drawdown of -42.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VALT-U.TO and CGL-C.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VALT-U.TO | CGL-C.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.65% | -42.11% | +3.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -38.65% | -25.90% | -12.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -38.65% | -25.90% | -12.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.65% | -25.90% | -12.75% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -25.90% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -37.72% | -25.63% | -12.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.11% | -18.52% | +12.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.30% | 9.74% | +4.56% |
Volatility
VALT-U.TO vs. CGL-C.TO - Volatility Comparison
CI Gold Bullion ETF (US$ Series) (VALT-U.TO) and iShares Gold Bullion ETF (CGL-C.TO) have volatilities of 8.30% and 8.39%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VALT-U.TO | CGL-C.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.30% | 8.39% | -0.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 39.00% | 23.16% | +15.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 41.49% | 27.09% | +14.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.08% | 18.31% | +4.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.39% | 16.68% | +5.71% |
Dividends
VALT-U.TO vs. CGL-C.TO - Dividend Comparison
Neither VALT-U.TO nor CGL-C.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
VALT-U.TO and CGL-C.TO have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
They also come from different issuers: CI and iShares.
Find the right allocation for VALT-U.TO and CGL-C.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer