ZJAN vs. ZJUL

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr January (ZJAN) and Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr July (ZJUL).

ZJAN and ZJUL are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ZJAN is an actively managed fund by Innovator. It was launched on Dec 31, 2024. ZJUL is an actively managed fund by Innovator. It was launched on Jun 28, 2024.

Performance

ZJAN vs. ZJUL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr January (ZJAN) and Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr July (ZJUL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

ZJAN vs. ZJUL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ZJAN Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr January	-0.26%	6.79%
ZJUL Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr July	-0.02%	7.53%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZJAN achieves a -0.26% return, which is significantly lower than ZJUL's -0.02% return.

ZJAN

• 1D: 0.11%
• 1M: -0.66%
• YTD: -0.26%
• 6M: 1.47%
• 1Y: 6.80%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ZJUL

• 1D: -0.03%
• 1M: -0.70%
• YTD: -0.02%
• 6M: 1.11%
• 1Y: 8.27%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZJAN vs. ZJUL - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both ZJAN and ZJUL have an expense ratio of 0.79%.

ZJAN

Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr January

ZJUL

Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr July

Return for Risk

ZJAN vs. ZJUL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZJAN

ZJAN Risk / Return Rank: 95
ZJAN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
ZJAN Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
ZJAN Omega Ratio Rank: 96
ZJAN Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
ZJAN Martin Ratio Rank: 96

ZJUL

ZJUL Risk / Return Rank: 85
ZJUL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
ZJUL Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
ZJUL Omega Ratio Rank: 91
ZJUL Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
ZJUL Martin Ratio Rank: 89

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZJAN vs. ZJUL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr January (ZJAN) and Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr July (ZJUL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ZJAN	ZJUL	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.27	1.63	+0.65
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.34	2.48	+0.86
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.54	1.41	+0.13
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.72	2.35	+1.37
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	18.13	12.52	+5.61
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ZJAN vs. ZJUL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZJAN Sharpe Ratio is 2.27, which is higher than the ZJUL Sharpe Ratio of 1.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZJAN and ZJUL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ZJAN	ZJUL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.27	1.63	+0.65
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.69	1.37	+0.32

Correlation

The correlation between ZJAN and ZJUL is 0.79, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

ZJAN vs. ZJUL - Dividend Comparison

Neither ZJAN nor ZJUL has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

ZJAN vs. ZJUL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZJAN drawdown since its inception was -3.20%, smaller than the maximum ZJUL drawdown of -5.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZJAN and ZJUL.

Drawdown Indicators

	ZJAN	ZJUL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-3.20%	-5.51%	+2.31%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.87%	-3.64%	+1.77%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.82%	-0.80%	-0.02%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.39%	-0.51%	+0.12%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.38%	0.68%	-0.30%

Volatility

ZJAN vs. ZJUL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr January (ZJAN) is 0.90%, while Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr July (ZJUL) has a volatility of 1.23%. This indicates that ZJAN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZJUL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ZJAN	ZJUL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.90%	1.23%	-0.33%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.59%	1.84%	-0.25%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.01%	5.11%	-2.10%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.11%	4.82%	-1.71%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.11%	4.82%	-1.71%