XBJA vs. DGT

In the year-to-date period, XBJA achieves a 1.92% return, which is significantly lower than DGT's 11.35% return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

XBJA has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than DGT's 0.50% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - January (XBJA) and SPDR Global Dow ETF (DGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current XBJA Sharpe Ratio is 0.60, which is lower than the DGT Sharpe Ratio of 1.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XBJA and DGT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

XBJA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DGT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.56%.

The maximum XBJA drawdown since its inception was -17.41%, smaller than the maximum DGT drawdown of -55.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XBJA and DGT.

Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - January (XBJA) and SPDR Global Dow ETF (DGT) have volatilities of 3.20% and 3.11%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.