ZINC vs. PIMIX
ZINC (Zacks Income ETF) and PIMIX (PIMCO Income Fund Institutional Class) are both funds - ZINC is a Dividend fund actively managed by Zacks, while PIMIX is a Multisector Bonds fund actively managed by PIMCO. Both are actively managed. Their 0.21 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. ZINC charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.54%/yr for PIMIX.
Performance
ZINC vs. PIMIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ZINC
- 1D
- 0.90%
- 1M
- 2.33%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
PIMIX
- 1D
- 0.37%
- 1M
- -1.11%
- 6M
- -0.27%
- YTD
- 0.32%
- 1Y
- 4.50%
- 3Y*
- 7.08%
- 5Y*
- 3.27%
- 10Y*
- 4.43%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.59%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
ZINC Zacks Income ETF | $195.58K | $433.78K | $222.56K |
ZINC vs. PIMIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
ZINC Zacks Income ETF | 4.83% |
PIMIX PIMCO Income Fund Institutional Class | -0.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZINC and PIMIX is 0.21, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 2, 2026 | 0.21 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZINC vs. PIMIX — Risk / Return Rank
ZINC
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
PIMIX
ZINC vs. PIMIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Zacks Income ETF (ZINC) and PIMCO Income Fund Institutional Class (PIMIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ZINC | PIMIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.21 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.28 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 4.05 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ZINC vs. PIMIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZINC drawdown since its inception was -2.86%, smaller than the maximum PIMIX drawdown of -13.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZINC and PIMIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZINC | PIMIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.86% | -13.39% | +10.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -3.69% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -3.69% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -13.34% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -13.39% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.88% | -1.59% | -0.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.59% | -1.68% | +1.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.16% | — |
Volatility
ZINC vs. PIMIX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZINC | PIMIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.24% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 3.57% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.78% | 4.09% | +6.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.78% | 4.89% | +5.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.78% | 4.27% | +6.51% |
ZINC vs. PIMIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZINC has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than PIMIX's 0.54% expense ratio.
Dividends
ZINC vs. PIMIX - Dividend Comparison
ZINC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PIMIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.32%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PIMIX PIMCO Income Fund Institutional Class | 5.32% | 6.01% | 6.27% | 6.21% | 4.98% | 4.02% | 4.88% | 5.83% | 5.66% | 5.37% | 5.52% | 7.88% |
ZINC Zacks Income ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ZINC and PIMIX have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for ZINC and PIMIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer