ZINC vs. HDLB
ZINC (Zacks Income ETF) and HDLB (ETRACS Monthly Pay 2xLeveraged US High Dividend Low Volatility ETN Series B) are both exchange-traded funds - ZINC is a Dividend fund actively managed by Zacks, while HDLB is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Solactive US High Dividend Low Volatility (USD)(TR) (200%). ZINC is actively managed, while HDLB is passively managed. Their 0.61 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. ZINC charges 0.55%/yr vs 1.65%/yr for HDLB.
Performance
ZINC vs. HDLB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ZINC
- 1D
- 0.90%
- 1M
- 2.33%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
HDLB
- 1D
- -0.35%
- 1M
- 6.53%
- 6M
- 5.50%
- YTD
- 25.42%
- 1Y
- 25.49%
- 3Y*
- 31.43%
- 5Y*
- 14.20%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 6.19%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $44.19K | $55.22K | $58.36K | |
ZINC Zacks Income ETF | $195.58K | $433.78K | $222.56K |
ZINC vs. HDLB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
ZINC Zacks Income ETF | 4.83% |
HDLB ETRACS Monthly Pay 2xLeveraged US High Dividend Low Volatility ETN Series B | 13.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZINC and HDLB is 0.61, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 2, 2026 | 0.61 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZINC vs. HDLB — Risk / Return Rank
ZINC
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
HDLB
ZINC vs. HDLB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Zacks Income ETF (ZINC) and ETRACS Monthly Pay 2xLeveraged US High Dividend Low Volatility ETN Series B (HDLB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ZINC | HDLB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.17 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.58 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 3.39 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ZINC vs. HDLB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZINC drawdown since its inception was -2.86%, smaller than the maximum HDLB drawdown of -78.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZINC and HDLB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZINC | HDLB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.86% | -78.70% | +75.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -16.17% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -20.94% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -43.81% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.88% | -5.40% | +3.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.59% | -26.98% | +26.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 7.53% | — |
Volatility
ZINC vs. HDLB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZINC | HDLB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 11.07% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 21.74% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.78% | 28.64% | -17.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.78% | 31.05% | -20.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.78% | 43.41% | -32.63% |
ZINC vs. HDLB - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZINC has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than HDLB's 1.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
ZINC vs. HDLB - Dividend Comparison
ZINC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HDLB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.17%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HDLB ETRACS Monthly Pay 2xLeveraged US High Dividend Low Volatility ETN Series B | 10.17% | 12.20% | 10.09% | 12.36% | 10.86% | 8.07% | 16.23% | 0.97% |
ZINC Zacks Income ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ZINC and HDLB have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ZINC is cheaper at 0.55% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ZINC is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 1.65% for HDLB.
HDLB has the higher dividend yield at 10.17%, compared with 0.00% for ZINC.
ZINC is categorized as Dividend, while HDLB is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: Zacks and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for ZINC and 1.65% for HDLB.
Find the right allocation for ZINC and HDLB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer