ZINC.L vs. GGRP.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

ZINC.L (WisdomTree Zinc) and GGRP.L (WisdomTree Global Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD) are both exchange-traded funds - ZINC.L is a Metals fund tracking the Bloomberg Zinc, while GGRP.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the WisdomTree Global Developed Quality Dividend Growth. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ZINC.L returned 5.86%/yr vs 7.46%/yr for GGRP.L. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ZINC.L charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for GGRP.L.

Performance

ZINC.L vs. GGRP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Zinc (ZINC.L) and WisdomTree Global Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD (GGRP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

ZINC.L is traded in USD, while GGRP.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the GGRP.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZINC.L achieves a 15.82% return, which is significantly higher than GGRP.L's 4.55% return.

ZINC.L

• 1D: -0.57%
• 1M: 6.40%
• YTD: 15.82%
• 6M: 17.29%
• 1Y: 38.82%
• 3Y*: 17.84%
• 5Y*: 5.86%
• 10Y*: 7.37%

GGRP.L

• 1D: 0.44%
• 1M: 3.87%
• YTD: 4.55%
• 6M: 6.12%
• 1Y: 15.21%
• 3Y*: 12.32%
• 5Y*: 7.46%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZINC.L vs. GGRP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ZINC.L WisdomTree Zinc	15.82%	6.70%	13.11%	-9.01%	-11.08%	26.65%	15.73%	-0.07%	-22.41%	17.28%
GGRP.L WisdomTree Global Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD	4.55%	15.14%	8.02%	17.51%	-13.56%	19.26%	16.37%	35.48%	-10.63%	22.20%

Correlation

The correlation between ZINC.L and GGRP.L is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.25
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.21
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.25
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2017	0.21

Return for Risk

ZINC.L vs. GGRP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZINC.L

ZINC.L Risk / Return Rank: 66
ZINC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
ZINC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
ZINC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 56
ZINC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
ZINC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 72

GGRP.L

GGRP.L Risk / Return Rank: 46
GGRP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
GGRP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
GGRP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 48
GGRP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
GGRP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 45

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZINC.L vs. GGRP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Zinc (ZINC.L) and WisdomTree Global Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD (GGRP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ZINC.L	GGRP.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.12	1.32	+0.79
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.93	2.07	+0.86
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.24	+0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.60	1.48	+2.11
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.28	5.90	+7.38
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ZINC.L vs. GGRP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZINC.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.12, which is higher than the GGRP.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZINC.L and GGRP.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ZINC.L	GGRP.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.12	1.32	+0.79
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.23	0.53	-0.29
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.31	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.03	0.86	-0.90

Drawdowns

ZINC.L vs. GGRP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZINC.L drawdown since its inception was -77.49%, which is greater than GGRP.L's maximum drawdown of -30.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZINC.L and GGRP.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	ZINC.L	GGRP.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-77.49%	-30.97%	-46.52%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.74%	-10.21%	-0.53%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.66%	-15.31%	-4.35%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-47.04%	-25.16%	-21.88%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-47.04%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-36.98%	0.00%	-36.98%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-56.38%	-4.79%	-51.59%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.90%	2.57%	+0.33%

Volatility

ZINC.L vs. GGRP.L - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree Zinc (ZINC.L) has a higher volatility of 4.90% compared to WisdomTree Global Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD (GGRP.L) at 3.01%. This indicates that ZINC.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GGRP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ZINC.L	GGRP.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.90%	3.01%	+1.89%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.12%	9.09%	+5.03%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.26%	11.47%	+6.79%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.18%	14.31%	+10.87%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.98%	17.44%	+6.54%

ZINC.L vs. GGRP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZINC.L has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than GGRP.L's 0.38% expense ratio.

Dividends

ZINC.L vs. GGRP.L - Dividend Comparison

ZINC.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GGRP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GGRP.L WisdomTree Global Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD	0.01%	0.01%	0.54%	1.86%	2.42%	1.60%	1.46%	1.88%	2.13%	1.41%
ZINC.L WisdomTree Zinc	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ZINC.L and GGRP.L in my portfolio?

ZINC.L and GGRP.L have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ZINC.L or GGRP.L?

On fees, GGRP.L is cheaper at 0.38% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ZINC.L or GGRP.L?

GGRP.L is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for ZINC.L.

What is the main difference between ZINC.L and GGRP.L?

ZINC.L is categorized as Metals, while GGRP.L is Global Equities. ZINC.L tracks Bloomberg Zinc, while GGRP.L tracks WisdomTree Global Developed Quality Dividend Growth. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for ZINC.L and 0.38% for GGRP.L.