ZINC.L vs. CORN.L
ZINC.L (WisdomTree Zinc) and CORN.L (WisdomTree Corn) are both exchange-traded funds - ZINC.L is a Metals fund tracking the Bloomberg Zinc, while CORN.L is a Agricultural Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg Corn. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ZINC.L returned 7.37%/yr vs -4.47%/yr for CORN.L. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.49% expense ratio.
Performance
ZINC.L vs. CORN.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZINC.L achieves a 15.82% return, which is significantly higher than CORN.L's -6.79% return. Over the past 10 years, ZINC.L has outperformed CORN.L with an annualized return of 7.37%, while CORN.L has yielded a comparatively lower -4.47% annualized return.
ZINC.L
- 1D
- -0.57%
- 1M
- 6.40%
- YTD
- 15.82%
- 6M
- 17.29%
- 1Y
- 38.82%
- 3Y*
- 17.84%
- 5Y*
- 5.86%
- 10Y*
- 7.37%
CORN.L
- 1D
- -2.89%
- 1M
- -11.26%
- YTD
- -6.79%
- 6M
- -8.17%
- 1Y
- -11.29%
- 3Y*
- -14.04%
- 5Y*
- -7.85%
- 10Y*
- -4.47%
ZINC.L vs. CORN.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZINC.L WisdomTree Zinc | 15.82% | 6.70% | 13.11% | -9.01% | -11.08% | 26.65% | 15.73% | -0.07% | -22.41% | 27.77% |
CORN.L WisdomTree Corn | -6.79% | -10.19% | -12.88% | -18.82% | 20.72% | 35.07% | 10.51% | -6.51% | -5.50% | -12.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZINC.L and CORN.L is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.07 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2006 | 0.13 |
The correlation between ZINC.L and CORN.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (1 year) to 0.13 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZINC.L vs. CORN.L — Risk / Return Rank
ZINC.L
CORN.L
ZINC.L vs. CORN.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Zinc (ZINC.L) and WisdomTree Corn (CORN.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ZINC.L | CORN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.74 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.69 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 0.91 | +0.43 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.60 | -0.84 | +4.43 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.28 | -1.73 | +15.00 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ZINC.L | CORN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.12 | -0.62 | +2.74 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 | -0.33 | +0.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.31 | -0.20 | +0.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.03 | -0.11 | +0.08 |
Drawdowns
ZINC.L vs. CORN.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZINC.L drawdown since its inception was -77.49%, smaller than the maximum CORN.L drawdown of -83.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZINC.L and CORN.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZINC.L | CORN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.49% | -83.80% | +6.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.74% | -13.44% | +2.70% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.66% | -46.84% | +27.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.04% | -49.13% | +2.09% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.04% | -56.00% | +8.96% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -36.98% | -77.23% | +40.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -56.38% | -58.83% | +2.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.90% | 6.53% | -3.63% |
Volatility
ZINC.L vs. CORN.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for WisdomTree Zinc (ZINC.L) is 4.90%, while WisdomTree Corn (CORN.L) has a volatility of 8.00%. This indicates that ZINC.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CORN.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZINC.L | CORN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.90% | 8.00% | -3.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.12% | 13.60% | +0.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.26% | 18.05% | +0.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.18% | 23.45% | +1.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.98% | 22.59% | +1.39% |
ZINC.L vs. CORN.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both ZINC.L and CORN.L have an expense ratio of 0.49%.
Dividends
ZINC.L vs. CORN.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither ZINC.L nor CORN.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
ZINC.L and CORN.L have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.49% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ZINC.L and CORN.L have the same expense ratio: 0.49% per year.
ZINC.L is categorized as Metals, while CORN.L is Agricultural Commodities. ZINC.L tracks Bloomberg Zinc, while CORN.L tracks Bloomberg Corn.
Find the right allocation for ZINC.L and CORN.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer