ZINC.L vs. B4NQ.DE
ZINC.L (WisdomTree Zinc) and B4NQ.DE (BNPP Kupfer (TR) ETC) are both Metals funds - ZINC.L tracks the Bloomberg Zinc while B4NQ.DE tracks the LME Copper Futures. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ZINC.L returned 5.86%/yr vs 8.92%/yr for B4NQ.DE. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ZINC.L charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for B4NQ.DE.
Performance
ZINC.L vs. B4NQ.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
ZINC.L is traded in USD, while B4NQ.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the B4NQ.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZINC.L achieves a 15.82% return, which is significantly higher than B4NQ.DE's 11.31% return.
ZINC.L
- 1D
- -0.57%
- 1M
- 6.40%
- YTD
- 15.82%
- 6M
- 17.29%
- 1Y
- 38.82%
- 3Y*
- 17.84%
- 5Y*
- 5.86%
- 10Y*
- 7.37%
B4NQ.DE
- 1D
- 0.33%
- 1M
- 6.42%
- YTD
- 11.31%
- 6M
- 23.06%
- 1Y
- 46.84%
- 3Y*
- 20.23%
- 5Y*
- 8.92%
- 10Y*
- —
ZINC.L vs. B4NQ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZINC.L WisdomTree Zinc | 15.82% | 6.70% | 13.11% | -9.01% | -11.08% | 26.65% | 15.73% | -0.07% | -22.41% | 25.52% |
B4NQ.DE BNPP Kupfer (TR) ETC | 11.31% | 44.12% | 4.83% | 3.13% | -10.31% | 24.06% | 24.63% | 4.20% | -17.53% | 27.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZINC.L and B4NQ.DE is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 31, 2017 | 0.55 |
The correlation between ZINC.L and B4NQ.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.57 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZINC.L vs. B4NQ.DE — Risk / Return Rank
ZINC.L
B4NQ.DE
ZINC.L vs. B4NQ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Zinc (ZINC.L) and BNPP Kupfer (TR) ETC (B4NQ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ZINC.L | B4NQ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.39 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.60 | 3.75 | -0.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.28 | 12.47 | +0.81 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ZINC.L | B4NQ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.12 | 2.09 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 | 0.40 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.31 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.03 | 0.53 | -0.56 |
Drawdowns
ZINC.L vs. B4NQ.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZINC.L drawdown since its inception was -77.49%, which is greater than B4NQ.DE's maximum drawdown of -36.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZINC.L and B4NQ.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZINC.L | B4NQ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.49% | -36.14% | -41.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.74% | -12.43% | +1.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.66% | -22.21% | +2.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.04% | -32.86% | -14.18% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.04% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -36.98% | -1.47% | -35.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -56.38% | -12.72% | -43.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.90% | 3.75% | -0.85% |
Volatility
ZINC.L vs. B4NQ.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for WisdomTree Zinc (ZINC.L) is 4.90%, while BNPP Kupfer (TR) ETC (B4NQ.DE) has a volatility of 5.93%. This indicates that ZINC.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than B4NQ.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZINC.L | B4NQ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.90% | 5.93% | -1.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.12% | 19.51% | -5.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.26% | 22.26% | -4.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.18% | 22.42% | +2.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.98% | 21.49% | +2.49% |
ZINC.L vs. B4NQ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZINC.L has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than B4NQ.DE's 0.90% expense ratio.
Dividends
ZINC.L vs. B4NQ.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither ZINC.L nor B4NQ.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
ZINC.L and B4NQ.DE have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ZINC.L is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ZINC.L is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for B4NQ.DE.
ZINC.L tracks Bloomberg Zinc, while B4NQ.DE tracks LME Copper Futures. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and BNP Paribas. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for ZINC.L and 0.90% for B4NQ.DE.
Find the right allocation for ZINC.L and B4NQ.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer