PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZIJMY vs. MUU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ZIJMY vs. MUU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Zijin Mining Group Co Ltd ADR (ZIJMY) and Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZIJMY achieves a -15.14% return, which is significantly lower than MUU's 642.75% return.


ZIJMY

1D
0.95%
1M
-5.61%
6M
-22.52%
YTD
-15.14%
1Y
53.72%
3Y*
39.48%
5Y*
24.76%
10Y*
29.25%

MUU

1D
-2.52%
1M
-10.27%
6M
421.21%
YTD
642.75%
1Y
3,083.51%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZIJMY vs. MUU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
ZIJMY
Zijin Mining Group Co Ltd ADR
-15.14%151.45%-17.52%
MUU
Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares
642.75%599.03%-40.91%

Correlation

The correlation between ZIJMY and MUU is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 10, 2024

0.18

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZIJMY vs. MUU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZIJMY
ZIJMY Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
ZIJMY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZIJMY Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZIJMY Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
ZIJMY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZIJMY Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

MUU
MUU Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
MUU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MUU Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
MUU Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
MUU Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
MUU Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZIJMY vs. MUU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Zijin Mining Group Co Ltd ADR (ZIJMY) and Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ZIJMYMUUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-26.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.72

-0.52

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.39

75.03

-73.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.41

245.78

-242.37

ZIJMY vs. MUU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZIJMY Sharpe Ratio is 1.09, which is lower than the MUU Sharpe Ratio of 27.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZIJMY and MUU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ZIJMY vs. MUU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZIJMY drawdown since its inception was -61.63%, smaller than the maximum MUU drawdown of -75.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZIJMY and MUU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZIJMYMUUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.63%

-75.07%

+13.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-39.52%

-52.72%

+13.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-39.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-34.11%

-30.01%

-4.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.20%

-23.40%

+0.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.11%

16.41%

-0.30%

Volatility

ZIJMY vs. MUU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Zijin Mining Group Co Ltd ADR (ZIJMY) is 16.68%, while Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU) has a volatility of 67.23%. This indicates that ZIJMY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MUU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZIJMYMUUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.68%

67.23%

-50.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

38.28%

116.08%

-77.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

50.62%

145.04%

-94.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

44.59%

138.03%

-93.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

47.09%

138.03%

-90.94%

Dividends

ZIJMY vs. MUU - Dividend Comparison

ZIJMY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.27%, more than MUU's 0.64% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MUU
Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares
0.64%4.27%0.31%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ZIJMY
Zijin Mining Group Co Ltd ADR
2.27%1.52%2.02%2.30%2.19%0.89%0.95%2.75%2.85%4.88%3.49%4.90%

Frequently Asked Questions


ZIJMY and MUU have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MUU has higher volatility (67.23%) compared to ZIJMY (16.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ZIJMY dropped -61.63% vs MUU's -75.07%.

MUU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (27.27 vs 1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZIJMY and MUU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer