ZIJMY vs. LUG.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about Zijin Mining Group Co Ltd ADR (ZIJMY) and Lundin Gold Inc. (LUG.TO).
Performance
ZIJMY vs. LUG.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ZIJMY vs. LUG.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZIJMY Zijin Mining Group Co Ltd ADR | 2.30% | 151.45% | 20.87% | 15.79% | 10.65% | 18.87% | 163.70% | 9.70% | 21.20% | 12.34% |
LUG.TO Lundin Gold Inc. | -3.37% | 310.07% | 76.47% | 32.52% | 21.88% | -3.96% | 33.84% | 75.27% | 1.60% | -7.93% |
Different Trading Currencies
ZIJMY is traded in USD, while LUG.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the LUG.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Fundamentals
ZIJMY:
$131.89B
LUG.TO:
CA$26.71B
ZIJMY:
$37.46
LUG.TO:
CA$3.28
ZIJMY:
2.49
LUG.TO:
33.54
ZIJMY:
0.07
LUG.TO:
0.45
ZIJMY:
0.37
LUG.TO:
14.90
ZIJMY:
0.72
LUG.TO:
19.61
ZIJMY:
$347.32B
LUG.TO:
CA$1.79B
ZIJMY:
$95.91B
LUG.TO:
CA$1.26B
ZIJMY:
$88.19B
LUG.TO:
CA$1.25B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZIJMY achieves a 2.30% return, which is significantly higher than LUG.TO's -3.37% return. Over the past 10 years, ZIJMY has underperformed LUG.TO with an annualized return of 34.69%, while LUG.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 38.23% annualized return.
ZIJMY
- 1D
- 2.69%
- 1M
- -20.10%
- YTD
- 2.30%
- 6M
- 10.57%
- 1Y
- 113.00%
- 3Y*
- 44.87%
- 5Y*
- 32.66%
- 10Y*
- 34.69%
LUG.TO
- 1D
- 3.58%
- 1M
- -12.75%
- YTD
- -3.37%
- 6M
- 23.53%
- 1Y
- 168.34%
- 3Y*
- 97.23%
- 5Y*
- 62.11%
- 10Y*
- 38.23%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZIJMY vs. LUG.TO — Risk / Return Rank
ZIJMY
LUG.TO
ZIJMY vs. LUG.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Zijin Mining Group Co Ltd ADR (ZIJMY) and Lundin Gold Inc. (LUG.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ZIJMY | LUG.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.36 | 2.78 | -0.42 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.58 | 2.79 | -0.20 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.40 | -0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.95 | 6.41 | -2.47 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.30 | 18.79 | -5.48 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ZIJMY | LUG.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.36 | 2.78 | -0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 | 1.30 | -0.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.75 | 0.84 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.47 | 0.38 | +0.09 |
Correlation
The correlation between ZIJMY and LUG.TO is 0.09, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
ZIJMY vs. LUG.TO - Dividend Comparison
ZIJMY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.49%, less than LUG.TO's 4.53% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZIJMY Zijin Mining Group Co Ltd ADR | 1.49% | 1.52% | 2.02% | 2.30% | 2.19% | 0.89% | 0.95% | 2.75% | 2.85% | 4.88% | 3.49% | 4.90% |
LUG.TO Lundin Gold Inc. | 4.53% | 3.37% | 2.69% | 3.28% | 1.97% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
ZIJMY vs. LUG.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZIJMY drawdown since its inception was -61.63%, smaller than the maximum LUG.TO drawdown of -79.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZIJMY and LUG.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZIJMY | LUG.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.63% | -95.45% | +33.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.84% | -25.33% | -2.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.04% | -38.94% | -4.10% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.32% | -41.84% | -7.48% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.57% | -13.30% | -7.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.14% | -65.22% | +42.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.26% | 8.82% | -0.56% |
Volatility
ZIJMY vs. LUG.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Zijin Mining Group Co Ltd ADR (ZIJMY) is 14.80%, while Lundin Gold Inc. (LUG.TO) has a volatility of 19.80%. This indicates that ZIJMY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LUG.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ZIJMY | LUG.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.80% | 19.80% | -5.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 38.85% | 44.87% | -6.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 48.22% | 60.88% | -12.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 44.30% | 47.99% | -3.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 46.53% | 45.62% | +0.91% |
Financials
ZIJMY vs. LUG.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Zijin Mining Group Co Ltd ADR and Lundin Gold Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ZIJMY vs. LUG.TO - Profitability Comparison
ZIJMY - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Zijin Mining Group Co Ltd ADR reported a gross profit of 32.65B and revenue of 93.57B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 34.9%.
LUG.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Lundin Gold Inc. reported a gross profit of 359.14M and revenue of 534.69M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 67.2%.
ZIJMY - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Zijin Mining Group Co Ltd ADR reported an operating income of 25.80B and revenue of 93.57B, resulting in an operating margin of 27.6%.
LUG.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Lundin Gold Inc. reported an operating income of 334.43M and revenue of 534.69M, resulting in an operating margin of 62.6%.
ZIJMY - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Zijin Mining Group Co Ltd ADR reported a net income of 13.72B and revenue of 93.57B, resulting in a net margin of 14.7%.
LUG.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Lundin Gold Inc. reported a net income of 237.81M and revenue of 534.69M, resulting in a net margin of 44.5%.