ZIG vs. MKL
ZIG (Acquirers Fund) is Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Acquirer's Index, while MKL (Markel Corporation) is a stock. Over the past 5 years, ZIG returned 9.39%/yr vs 7.68%/yr for MKL. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
ZIG vs. MKL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZIG achieves a 8.67% return, which is significantly higher than MKL's -17.31% return.
ZIG
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- 1.00%
- YTD
- 8.67%
- 6M
- 5.36%
- 1Y
- 16.94%
- 3Y*
- 14.07%
- 5Y*
- 9.39%
- 10Y*
- —
MKL
- 1D
- -0.55%
- 1M
- 1.50%
- YTD
- -17.31%
- 6M
- -13.58%
- 1Y
- -9.20%
- 3Y*
- 9.28%
- 5Y*
- 7.68%
- 10Y*
- 6.32%
ZIG vs. MKL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZIG Acquirers Fund | 8.67% | -2.67% | 11.34% | 36.70% | -17.34% | 37.38% | -15.76% | 9.07% |
MKL Markel Corporation | -17.31% | 24.53% | 21.57% | 7.77% | 6.77% | 19.42% | -9.61% | 9.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZIG and MKL is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 16, 2019 | 0.51 |
The correlation between ZIG and MKL shifts across timeframes, from 0.32 (1 year) to 0.51 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZIG vs. MKL — Risk / Return Rank
ZIG
MKL
ZIG vs. MKL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Acquirers Fund (ZIG) and Markel Corporation (MKL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ZIG | MKL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.44 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 0.93 | +0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.37 | -0.46 | +1.83 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.12 | -1.16 | +5.27 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ZIG | MKL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 | -0.49 | +1.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 | 0.34 | +0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.25 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.35 | 0.46 | -0.12 |
Drawdowns
ZIG vs. MKL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZIG drawdown since its inception was -37.14%, smaller than the maximum MKL drawdown of -61.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZIG and MKL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZIG | MKL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.14% | -61.32% | +24.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.38% | -20.10% | +7.72% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.75% | -20.10% | -9.65% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.75% | -28.87% | -0.88% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -44.66% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.64% | -18.90% | +13.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.74% | -11.39% | +1.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.12% | 7.97% | -3.85% |
Volatility
ZIG vs. MKL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Acquirers Fund (ZIG) is 2.97%, while Markel Corporation (MKL) has a volatility of 3.91%. This indicates that ZIG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MKL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZIG | MKL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.97% | 3.91% | -0.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.23% | 13.04% | -2.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.95% | 18.78% | -0.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.48% | 22.41% | -1.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.14% | 25.27% | -3.13% |
Dividends
ZIG vs. MKL - Dividend Comparison
ZIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.76%, while MKL has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MKL Markel Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ZIG Acquirers Fund | 1.76% | 1.91% | 1.96% | 1.07% | 1.26% | 0.18% | 0.18% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ZIG and MKL have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MKL has higher volatility (3.91%) compared to ZIG (2.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ZIG dropped -37.14% vs MKL's -61.32%.
ZIG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.95 vs -0.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ZIG and MKL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer