PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MKL vs. FRFHF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MKL vs. FRFHF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Markel Group Inc. (MKL) and Fairfax Financial Holdings Ltd (FRFHF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MKL achieves a -11.89% return, which is significantly higher than FRFHF's -15.92% return. Over the past 10 years, MKL has underperformed FRFHF with an annualized return of 7.48%, while FRFHF has yielded a comparatively higher 14.03% annualized return.


MKL

1D
1.89%
1M
1.94%
YTD
-11.89%
6M
-13.46%
1Y
-4.57%
3Y*
12.67%
5Y*
10.04%
10Y*
7.48%

FRFHF

1D
0.90%
1M
-1.66%
YTD
-15.92%
6M
-14.26%
1Y
-11.24%
3Y*
31.13%
5Y*
30.71%
10Y*
14.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MKL vs. FRFHF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MKL
Markel Group Inc.
-11.89%24.53%21.57%7.77%6.77%19.42%-9.61%10.13%-8.87%25.94%
FRFHF
Fairfax Financial Holdings Ltd
-15.92%38.79%53.39%57.56%23.17%48.23%-25.75%8.88%-15.44%11.34%

Correlation

The correlation between MKL and FRFHF is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.33

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 2002

0.23

The correlation between MKL and FRFHF shifts across timeframes, from 0.23 (all time) to 0.35 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

MKL:

$176.96

FRFHF:

$218.52

PE Ratio

MKL:

10.70

FRFHF:

7.28

PEG Ratio

MKL:

0.19

FRFHF:

0.18

PS Ratio

MKL:

1.07

FRFHF:

1.11

Total Revenue (TTM)

MKL:

$16.57B

FRFHF:

$29.68B

Gross Profit (TTM)

MKL:

$7.80B

FRFHF:

$6.18B

EBITDA (TTM)

MKL:

$2.55B

FRFHF:

$7.97B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MKL vs. FRFHF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MKL
MKL Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
MKL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MKL Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
MKL Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
MKL Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
MKL Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

FRFHF
FRFHF Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
FRFHF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRFHF Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRFHF Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
FRFHF Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRFHF Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MKL vs. FRFHF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Markel Group Inc. (MKL) and Fairfax Financial Holdings Ltd (FRFHF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MKLFRFHFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.97

0.93

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.23

-0.58

+0.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.52

-1.23

+0.70

MKL vs. FRFHF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MKL Sharpe Ratio is -0.24, which is higher than the FRFHF Sharpe Ratio of -0.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MKL and FRFHF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MKL vs. FRFHF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MKL drawdown since its inception was -61.32%, roughly equal to the maximum FRFHF drawdown of -58.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MKL and FRFHF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MKLFRFHFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.32%

-58.92%

-2.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.10%

-19.55%

-0.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.10%

-19.55%

-0.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.87%

-20.88%

-7.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.66%

-58.92%

+14.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.59%

-16.30%

+2.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.39%

-12.48%

+1.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.77%

9.19%

-0.42%

Volatility

MKL vs. FRFHF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Markel Group Inc. (MKL) is 4.80%, while Fairfax Financial Holdings Ltd (FRFHF) has a volatility of 5.30%. This indicates that MKL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FRFHF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MKLFRFHFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.80%

5.30%

-0.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.25%

16.74%

-3.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.97%

21.73%

-2.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.39%

25.64%

-3.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.28%

27.18%

-1.90%

Dividends

MKL vs. FRFHF - Dividend Comparison

MKL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FRFHF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.94%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FRFHF
Fairfax Financial Holdings Ltd
0.94%0.79%1.08%1.09%1.68%2.03%2.93%2.13%2.27%1.89%2.09%2.12%
MKL
Markel Group Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

MKL vs. FRFHF - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Markel Group Inc. and Fairfax Financial Holdings Ltd. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00B7.00B8.00B20222023202420252026
3.55B
6.41B
(MKL) Total Revenue
(FRFHF) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

MKL vs. FRFHF - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Markel Group Inc. and Fairfax Financial Holdings Ltd over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-100.0%-50.0%0.0%50.0%100.0%202220232024202520260
15.4%
Portfolio components
MKL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Markel Group Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 3.55B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

FRFHF - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fairfax Financial Holdings Ltd reported a gross profit of 986.70M and revenue of 6.41B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 15.4%.

MKL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Markel Group Inc. reported an operating income of -273.33M and revenue of 3.55B, resulting in an operating margin of -7.7%.

FRFHF - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fairfax Financial Holdings Ltd reported an operating income of 1.04B and revenue of 6.41B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.2%.

MKL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Markel Group Inc. reported a net income of -335.52M and revenue of 3.55B, resulting in a net margin of -9.5%.

FRFHF - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fairfax Financial Holdings Ltd reported a net income of 695.70M and revenue of 6.41B, resulting in a net margin of 10.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


MKL and FRFHF have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FRFHF has higher volatility (5.30%) compared to MKL (4.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MKL dropped -61.32% vs FRFHF's -58.92%.

MKL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.24 vs -0.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MKL and FRFHF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer