ZI vs. CFLT
ZI (ZoomInfo Technologies Inc.) and CFLT (Confluent, Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Technology sector — ZI in Software - Application, CFLT in Software - Infrastructure. At a 0.50 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ZI vs. CFLT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ZI
- 1D
- -10.34%
- 1M
- -48.50%
- YTD
- -66.32%
- 6M
- -66.12%
- 1Y
- -64.21%
- 3Y*
- -49.41%
- 5Y*
- -39.37%
- 10Y*
- —
CFLT
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ZI vs. CFLT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZI ZoomInfo Technologies Inc. | -66.32% | -3.24% | -43.16% | -38.59% | -53.10% | 20.81% |
CFLT Confluent, Inc. | 2.48% | 8.15% | 19.49% | 5.22% | -70.83% | 69.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZI and CFLT is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2021 | 0.50 |
The correlation between ZI and CFLT shifts across timeframes, from 0.34 (1 year) to 0.50 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
ZI:
$0.49
CFLT:
-$0.85
ZI:
0.70
CFLT:
9.20
ZI:
$1.25B
CFLT:
$1.17B
ZI:
$1.05B
CFLT:
$866.84M
ZI:
$215.30M
CFLT:
-$339.97M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZI vs. CFLT — Risk / Return Rank
ZI
CFLT
ZI vs. CFLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ZoomInfo Technologies Inc. (ZI) and Confluent, Inc. (CFLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ZI | CFLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.06 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.64 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.77 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.87 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.95 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ZI | CFLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.06 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.65 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.52 | — | — |
Drawdowns
ZI vs. CFLT - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZI | CFLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -95.85% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -73.69% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -88.91% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -95.85% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -95.57% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -57.89% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 32.82% | — | — |
Volatility
ZI vs. CFLT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZI | CFLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 44.10% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 56.54% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 60.86% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 60.77% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 61.69% | — | — |
Dividends
ZI vs. CFLT - Dividend Comparison
Neither ZI nor CFLT has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
ZI vs. CFLT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between ZoomInfo Technologies Inc. and Confluent, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ZI vs. CFLT - Profitability Comparison
ZI - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ZoomInfo Technologies Inc. reported a gross profit of 259.20M and revenue of 310.20M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 83.6%.
CFLT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Confluent, Inc. reported a gross profit of 235.16M and revenue of 314.82M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 74.7%.
ZI - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ZoomInfo Technologies Inc. reported an operating income of 57.90M and revenue of 310.20M, resulting in an operating margin of 18.7%.
CFLT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Confluent, Inc. reported an operating income of -99.17M and revenue of 314.82M, resulting in an operating margin of -31.5%.
ZI - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ZoomInfo Technologies Inc. reported a net income of 29.30M and revenue of 310.20M, resulting in a net margin of 9.5%.
CFLT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Confluent, Inc. reported a net income of -79.25M and revenue of 314.82M, resulting in a net margin of -25.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
ZI and CFLT have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for ZI and CFLT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer