ZI vs. FANG
ZI (ZoomInfo Technologies Inc.) and FANG (Diamondback Energy, Inc.) are both stocks. ZI operates in Software - Application (Technology), while FANG operates in Oil & Gas E&P (Energy). Over the past 5 years, ZI returned -39.37%/yr vs 23.66%/yr for FANG. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ZI vs. FANG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZI achieves a -66.32% return, which is significantly lower than FANG's 36.19% return.
ZI
- 1D
- -10.34%
- 1M
- -48.50%
- YTD
- -66.32%
- 6M
- -66.12%
- 1Y
- -64.21%
- 3Y*
- -49.41%
- 5Y*
- -39.37%
- 10Y*
- —
FANG
- 1D
- 1.69%
- 1M
- -1.99%
- YTD
- 36.19%
- 6M
- 31.25%
- 1Y
- 50.90%
- 3Y*
- 19.82%
- 5Y*
- 23.66%
- 10Y*
- 11.38%
ZI vs. FANG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZI ZoomInfo Technologies Inc. | -66.32% | -3.24% | -43.16% | -38.59% | -53.10% | 33.11% | 41.85% |
FANG Diamondback Energy, Inc. | 36.19% | -5.64% | 10.35% | 19.66% | 35.34% | 127.51% | 3.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZI and FANG is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2020 | 0.10 |
The correlation between ZI and FANG shifts across timeframes, from 0.03 (1 year) to 0.15 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
ZI:
$0.49
FANG:
$1.40
ZI:
6.93
FANG:
144.45
ZI:
0.70
FANG:
3.83
ZI:
$1.25B
FANG:
$15.19B
ZI:
$1.05B
FANG:
$7.30B
ZI:
$215.30M
FANG:
$5.54B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZI vs. FANG — Risk / Return Rank
ZI
FANG
ZI vs. FANG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ZoomInfo Technologies Inc. (ZI) and Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ZI | FANG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.06 | 1.66 | -2.72 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.64 | 2.24 | -3.88 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.77 | 1.27 | -0.50 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.87 | 4.33 | -5.20 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.95 | 8.64 | -10.60 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ZI | FANG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.06 | 1.66 | -2.72 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.65 | 0.63 | -1.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.23 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.52 | 0.47 | -0.99 |
Drawdowns
ZI vs. FANG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZI drawdown since its inception was -95.85%, which is greater than FANG's maximum drawdown of -88.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZI and FANG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZI | FANG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -95.85% | -88.72% | -7.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -73.69% | -12.53% | -61.16% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -88.91% | -42.10% | -46.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -95.85% | -42.10% | -53.75% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -88.72% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -95.57% | -4.76% | -90.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -57.89% | -19.40% | -38.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 32.82% | 6.28% | +26.54% |
Volatility
ZI vs. FANG - Volatility Comparison
ZoomInfo Technologies Inc. (ZI) has a higher volatility of 44.10% compared to Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG) at 11.04%. This indicates that ZI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FANG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZI | FANG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 44.10% | 11.04% | +33.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 56.54% | 22.59% | +33.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 60.86% | 30.83% | +30.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 60.77% | 37.84% | +22.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 61.69% | 49.02% | +12.67% |
Dividends
ZI vs. FANG - Dividend Comparison
ZI has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FANG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.05%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FANG Diamondback Energy, Inc. | 2.05% | 2.66% | 5.06% | 5.15% | 6.55% | 1.62% | 3.10% | 0.74% | 0.40% |
ZI ZoomInfo Technologies Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
ZI vs. FANG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between ZoomInfo Technologies Inc. and Diamondback Energy, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ZI vs. FANG - Profitability Comparison
ZI - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ZoomInfo Technologies Inc. reported a gross profit of 259.20M and revenue of 310.20M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 83.6%.
FANG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Diamondback Energy, Inc. reported a gross profit of 3.85B and revenue of 4.24B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 90.9%.
ZI - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ZoomInfo Technologies Inc. reported an operating income of 57.90M and revenue of 310.20M, resulting in an operating margin of 18.7%.
FANG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Diamondback Energy, Inc. reported an operating income of 30.00M and revenue of 4.24B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.7%.
ZI - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ZoomInfo Technologies Inc. reported a net income of 29.30M and revenue of 310.20M, resulting in a net margin of 9.5%.
FANG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Diamondback Energy, Inc. reported a net income of 144.00M and revenue of 4.24B, resulting in a net margin of 3.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
ZI and FANG have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ZI has higher volatility (44.10%) compared to FANG (11.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ZI dropped -95.85% vs FANG's -88.72%.
FANG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.66 vs -1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ZI and FANG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer