PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CFLT vs. PLTR
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


CFLTPLTR
YTD Return21.92%244.67%
1Y Return43.29%196.64%
3Y Return (Ann)-29.15%36.34%
Sharpe Ratio0.723.13
Sortino Ratio1.594.00
Omega Ratio1.201.52
Calmar Ratio0.563.33
Martin Ratio1.8716.32
Ulcer Index24.07%12.05%
Daily Std Dev62.08%62.95%
Max Drawdown-82.61%-84.62%
Current Drawdown-69.52%-2.50%

Fundamentals


CFLTPLTR
Market Cap$9.09B$136.34B
EPS-$1.10$0.20
PEG Ratio0.623.00
Total Revenue (TTM)$915.61M$2.65B
Gross Profit (TTM)$668.69M$2.15B
EBITDA (TTM)-$382.02M$397.71M

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.6

The correlation between CFLT and PLTR is 0.61, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

CFLT vs. PLTR - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, CFLT achieves a 21.92% return, which is significantly lower than PLTR's 244.67% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-50.00%0.00%50.00%100.00%150.00%200.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-9.52%
173.34%
CFLT
PLTR

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

CFLT vs. PLTR - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Confluent, Inc. (CFLT) and Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CFLT
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CFLT, currently valued at 0.72, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.72
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for CFLT, currently valued at 1.59, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.001.59
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for CFLT, currently valued at 1.20, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.20
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for CFLT, currently valued at 0.56, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.56
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for CFLT, currently valued at 1.87, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.001.87
PLTR
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for PLTR, currently valued at 3.13, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.003.13
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for PLTR, currently valued at 4.00, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.004.00
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for PLTR, currently valued at 1.52, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.52
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for PLTR, currently valued at 4.43, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.004.43
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for PLTR, currently valued at 16.32, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0016.32

CFLT vs. PLTR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CFLT Sharpe Ratio is 0.72, which is lower than the PLTR Sharpe Ratio of 3.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CFLT and PLTR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.004.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
0.72
3.13
CFLT
PLTR

Dividends

CFLT vs. PLTR - Dividend Comparison

Neither CFLT nor PLTR has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

CFLT vs. PLTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CFLT drawdown since its inception was -82.61%, roughly equal to the maximum PLTR drawdown of -84.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CFLT and PLTR. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-80.00%-60.00%-40.00%-20.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-69.52%
-2.50%
CFLT
PLTR

Volatility

CFLT vs. PLTR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Confluent, Inc. (CFLT) is 15.39%, while Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR) has a volatility of 24.03%. This indicates that CFLT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PLTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
15.39%
24.03%
CFLT
PLTR

Financials

CFLT vs. PLTR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Confluent, Inc. and Palantir Technologies Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items