ZHDG vs. PBP

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ZHDG (ZEGA Buy and Hedge ETF) and PBP (Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. ZHDG is actively managed, while PBP is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, ZHDG returned 14.68%/yr vs 11.58%/yr for PBP. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ZHDG charges 0.98%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for PBP.

Performance

ZHDG vs. PBP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ZEGA Buy and Hedge ETF (ZHDG) and Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF (PBP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with ZHDG having a 5.12% return and PBP slightly lower at 4.90%.

ZHDG

• 1D: -0.60%
• 1M: 4.65%
• YTD: 5.12%
• 6M: 5.49%
• 1Y: 18.31%
• 3Y*: 14.68%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PBP

• 1D: -0.17%
• 1M: 2.03%
• YTD: 4.90%
• 6M: 6.44%
• 1Y: 18.32%
• 3Y*: 11.58%
• 5Y*: 8.10%
• 10Y*: 7.14%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZHDG vs. PBP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
ZHDG ZEGA Buy and Hedge ETF	5.12%	14.34%	18.02%	13.14%	-22.07%	6.41%
PBP Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF	4.90%	8.49%	19.83%	11.59%	-11.82%	8.26%

Correlation

The correlation between ZHDG and PBP is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.70
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.65
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 8, 2021	0.70

The correlation between ZHDG and PBP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.

ZHDG vs. PBP - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ZHDG	PBP
Technology	33.1%	39.5%
Financial Services	12.3%	11.4%
Communication Services	10.7%	10.9%
Consumer Cyclical	10.1%	10.2%
Healthcare	9.8%	8.6%
Industrials	8.7%	7.8%
Consumer Defensive	5.4%	4.7%
Energy	3.5%	3.3%
Utilities	2.5%	2.6%
Real Estate	2.0%	1.8%
Basic Materials	1.9%	1.8%

Return for Risk

ZHDG vs. PBP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZHDG

ZHDG Risk / Return Rank: 51
ZHDG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
ZHDG Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
ZHDG Omega Ratio Rank: 51
ZHDG Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
ZHDG Martin Ratio Rank: 53

PBP

PBP Risk / Return Rank: 82
PBP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
PBP Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
PBP Omega Ratio Rank: 90
PBP Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
PBP Martin Ratio Rank: 86

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZHDG vs. PBP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ZEGA Buy and Hedge ETF (ZHDG) and Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF (PBP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ZHDG	PBP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.79	2.68	-0.88
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.50	3.86	-1.36
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.60	-0.28
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.15	3.52	-1.37
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.97	18.66	-9.69
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ZHDG vs. PBP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZHDG Sharpe Ratio is 1.79, which is lower than the PBP Sharpe Ratio of 2.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZHDG and PBP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ZHDG	PBP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.79	2.68	-0.88
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.69	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.52	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.51	0.35	+0.17

Drawdowns

ZHDG vs. PBP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZHDG drawdown since its inception was -23.27%, smaller than the maximum PBP drawdown of -43.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZHDG and PBP.

Drawdown Indicators

	ZHDG	PBP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.27%	-43.43%	+20.16%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.56%	-5.22%	-3.34%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-11.63%	-15.42%	+3.79%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-18.61%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-33.31%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.60%	-0.17%	-0.43%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.16%	-6.69%	-1.47%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.05%	0.98%	+1.07%

Volatility

ZHDG vs. PBP - Volatility Comparison

ZEGA Buy and Hedge ETF (ZHDG) has a higher volatility of 2.80% compared to Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF (PBP) at 0.93%. This indicates that ZHDG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PBP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ZHDG	PBP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.80%	0.93%	+1.87%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.06%	5.53%	+2.53%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.27%	6.87%	+3.40%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.75%	11.86%	-0.11%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.75%	13.66%	-1.91%

ZHDG vs. PBP - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZHDG has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than PBP's 0.29% expense ratio.

Dividends

ZHDG vs. PBP - Dividend Comparison

ZHDG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.44%, less than PBP's 11.16% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PBP Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF	11.16%	11.12%	9.36%	3.35%	1.33%	6.21%	1.41%	5.04%	2.59%	10.86%	2.56%	6.19%
ZHDG ZEGA Buy and Hedge ETF	2.44%	2.57%	2.59%	1.52%	3.58%	1.33%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ZHDG and PBP in my portfolio?

ZHDG and PBP have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ZHDG or PBP?

ZHDG has higher volatility (2.80%) compared to PBP (0.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ZHDG dropped -23.27% vs PBP's -43.43%.

Which ETF is better, ZHDG or PBP?

On 3-year performance, ZHDG leads with 14.68% vs 11.58% for PBP. On fees, PBP is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, PBP has been the lower-risk option at 0.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ZHDG or PBP?

Over the 3-year period, ZHDG has performed better with a 14.68% return vs 11.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ZHDG or PBP?

PBP is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for ZHDG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ZHDG or PBP?

PBP has the higher dividend yield at 11.16%, compared with 2.44% for ZHDG.

What is the main difference between ZHDG and PBP?

They also come from different issuers: ZEGA and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.98% for ZHDG and 0.29% for PBP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PBP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.68 vs 1.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.