ZGRO.TO vs. ZEB.TO
ZGRO.TO (BMO Growth ETF) and ZEB.TO (BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ZGRO.TO is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by BMO, while ZEB.TO is a Financials Equities fund tracking the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks Index. ZGRO.TO is actively managed, while ZEB.TO is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ZGRO.TO returned 11.51%/yr vs 18.18%/yr for ZEB.TO. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ZGRO.TO charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for ZEB.TO.
Performance
ZGRO.TO vs. ZEB.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZGRO.TO achieves a 10.53% return, which is significantly lower than ZEB.TO's 19.22% return.
ZGRO.TO
- 1D
- -0.41%
- 1M
- 5.37%
- YTD
- 10.53%
- 6M
- 10.31%
- 1Y
- 25.76%
- 3Y*
- 18.49%
- 5Y*
- 11.51%
- 10Y*
- —
ZEB.TO
- 1D
- -0.43%
- 1M
- 5.51%
- YTD
- 19.22%
- 6M
- 24.72%
- 1Y
- 60.22%
- 3Y*
- 32.73%
- 5Y*
- 18.18%
- 10Y*
- 15.82%
ZGRO.TO vs. ZEB.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZGRO.TO BMO Growth ETF | 10.53% | 16.39% | 20.71% | 14.64% | -10.58% | 14.99% | 10.81% | 10.83% |
ZEB.TO BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF | 19.22% | 43.43% | 24.58% | 10.87% | -10.38% | 39.38% | 3.52% | 4.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZGRO.TO and ZEB.TO is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2019 | 0.63 |
The correlation between ZGRO.TO and ZEB.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.
ZGRO.TO vs. ZEB.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ZGRO.TO
ZEB.TO
Technology
-
Financial Services
Industrials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
Healthcare
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
ZGRO.TO
ZEB.TO
-
Financial Services
ZGRO.TO
ZEB.TO
Industrials
ZGRO.TO
ZEB.TO
-
Consumer Cyclical
ZGRO.TO
ZEB.TO
-
Energy
ZGRO.TO
ZEB.TO
-
Basic Materials
ZGRO.TO
ZEB.TO
-
Healthcare
ZGRO.TO
ZEB.TO
-
Communication Services
ZGRO.TO
ZEB.TO
-
Consumer Defensive
ZGRO.TO
ZEB.TO
-
Utilities
ZGRO.TO
ZEB.TO
-
Real Estate
ZGRO.TO
ZEB.TO
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZGRO.TO vs. ZEB.TO — Risk / Return Rank
ZGRO.TO
ZEB.TO
ZGRO.TO vs. ZEB.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO Growth ETF (ZGRO.TO) and BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF (ZEB.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ZGRO.TO | ZEB.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.90 | -0.46 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.76 | 7.17 | -3.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.21 | 30.84 | -15.64 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ZGRO.TO | ZEB.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.39 | 4.79 | -2.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.08 | 1.35 | -0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.94 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.91 | 0.88 | +0.03 |
Drawdowns
ZGRO.TO vs. ZEB.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZGRO.TO drawdown since its inception was -24.64%, smaller than the maximum ZEB.TO drawdown of -39.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZGRO.TO and ZEB.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZGRO.TO | ZEB.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.64% | -39.69% | +15.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.87% | -8.44% | +1.57% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.45% | -14.80% | +2.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.19% | -25.97% | +8.78% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.69% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.41% | -2.00% | +1.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.38% | -5.65% | +2.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.70% | 1.96% | -0.26% |
Volatility
ZGRO.TO vs. ZEB.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for BMO Growth ETF (ZGRO.TO) is 4.11%, while BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF (ZEB.TO) has a volatility of 4.89%. This indicates that ZGRO.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZEB.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZGRO.TO | ZEB.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.11% | 4.89% | -0.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.00% | 11.14% | -2.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.81% | 12.62% | -1.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.76% | 13.52% | -2.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.99% | 16.91% | -3.92% |
ZGRO.TO vs. ZEB.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZGRO.TO has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than ZEB.TO's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
ZGRO.TO vs. ZEB.TO - Dividend Comparison
ZGRO.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.48%, less than ZEB.TO's 2.54% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZEB.TO BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF | 2.54% | 2.95% | 3.98% | 4.75% | 4.29% | 3.13% | 4.15% | 3.65% | 3.64% | 3.02% | 3.19% | 3.70% |
ZGRO.TO BMO Growth ETF | 1.48% | 1.70% | 1.92% | 2.27% | 2.54% | 2.22% | 2.49% | 2.32% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ZGRO.TO and ZEB.TO have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ZGRO.TO is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ZGRO.TO is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for ZEB.TO.
ZGRO.TO is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while ZEB.TO is Financials Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for ZGRO.TO and 0.25% for ZEB.TO.
Find the right allocation for ZGRO.TO and ZEB.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer