PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZGLD.SW vs. XSLR.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ZGLD.SW vs. XSLR.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CHF 10,000 investment in Swisscanto (CH) Gold ETF EA CHF (ZGLD.SW) and Xtrackers IE Physical Silver ETC Securities (XSLR.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

ZGLD.SW is traded in CHF, while XSLR.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the XSLR.DE values have been converted to CHF using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZGLD.SW achieves a 1.61% return, which is significantly higher than XSLR.DE's -3.86% return.


ZGLD.SW

1D
-0.86%
1M
-1.33%
YTD
1.61%
6M
3.70%
1Y
26.58%
3Y*
24.75%
5Y*
15.03%
10Y*
10.72%

XSLR.DE

1D
-2.81%
1M
1.16%
YTD
-3.86%
6M
23.41%
1Y
104.10%
3Y*
38.98%
5Y*
18.07%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZGLD.SW vs. XSLR.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
ZGLD.SW
Swisscanto (CH) Gold ETF EA CHF
1.61%45.59%35.04%3.06%0.89%-1.00%-0.41%
XSLR.DE
Xtrackers IE Physical Silver ETC Securities
-3.86%127.34%32.53%-10.07%5.89%-10.35%34.09%

Correlation

The correlation between ZGLD.SW and XSLR.DE is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.66

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 2, 2020

0.67

The correlation between ZGLD.SW and XSLR.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZGLD.SW vs. XSLR.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZGLD.SW
ZGLD.SW Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
ZGLD.SW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZGLD.SW Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZGLD.SW Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
ZGLD.SW Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZGLD.SW Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

XSLR.DE
XSLR.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
XSLR.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XSLR.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
XSLR.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
XSLR.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
XSLR.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZGLD.SW vs. XSLR.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Swisscanto (CH) Gold ETF EA CHF (ZGLD.SW) and Xtrackers IE Physical Silver ETC Securities (XSLR.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ZGLD.SWXSLR.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.74

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.67

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.34

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.60

2.67

-1.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.18

5.78

-1.60

ZGLD.SW vs. XSLR.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZGLD.SW Sharpe Ratio is 1.18, which is lower than the XSLR.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZGLD.SW and XSLR.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ZGLD.SWXSLR.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.18

1.91

-0.74

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

0.54

+0.43

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

0.66

-0.19

Drawdowns

ZGLD.SW vs. XSLR.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZGLD.SW drawdown since its inception was -38.49%, roughly equal to the maximum XSLR.DE drawdown of -38.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZGLD.SW and XSLR.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZGLD.SWXSLR.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.49%

-38.73%

+0.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.91%

-38.73%

+21.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.91%

-38.73%

+21.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.94%

-38.73%

+21.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-16.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.57%

-33.79%

+18.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.22%

-15.12%

+0.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.42%

17.95%

-11.53%

Volatility

ZGLD.SW vs. XSLR.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Swisscanto (CH) Gold ETF EA CHF (ZGLD.SW) is 5.57%, while Xtrackers IE Physical Silver ETC Securities (XSLR.DE) has a volatility of 17.03%. This indicates that ZGLD.SW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XSLR.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZGLD.SWXSLR.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.57%

17.03%

-11.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.85%

51.62%

-31.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.01%

54.15%

-31.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.68%

33.40%

-17.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.10%

33.27%

-19.17%

ZGLD.SW vs. XSLR.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZGLD.SW has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than XSLR.DE's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

ZGLD.SW vs. XSLR.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither ZGLD.SW nor XSLR.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


ZGLD.SW and XSLR.DE have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XSLR.DE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XSLR.DE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for ZGLD.SW.

ZGLD.SW is categorized as Precious Metals, while XSLR.DE is Silver. ZGLD.SW tracks Gold Bullion, while XSLR.DE tracks LBMA Silver Price. They also come from different issuers: Swisscanto and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for ZGLD.SW and 0.20% for XSLR.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZGLD.SW and XSLR.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer