ZFL.TO vs. VOO
ZFL.TO (BMO Long Federal Bond) and VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ZFL.TO is a Canadian Government Bonds fund tracking the FTSE TMX Canada Long Term Federal Bond Index, while VOO is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ZFL.TO returned -1.37%/yr vs 16.44%/yr for VOO. At a correlation of -0.09, they often move in opposite directions. ZFL.TO charges 0.22%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VOO.
Performance
ZFL.TO vs. VOO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
ZFL.TO is traded in CAD, while VOO is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the VOO values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZFL.TO achieves a 2.39% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's 12.66% return. Over the past 10 years, ZFL.TO has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of -1.37%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 16.44% annualized return.
ZFL.TO
- 1D
- -0.33%
- 1M
- 2.93%
- YTD
- 2.39%
- 6M
- -0.37%
- 1Y
- -0.83%
- 3Y*
- -0.42%
- 5Y*
- -3.89%
- 10Y*
- -1.37%
VOO
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 7.45%
- YTD
- 12.66%
- 6M
- 10.84%
- 1Y
- 30.08%
- 3Y*
- 23.99%
- 5Y*
- 17.22%
- 10Y*
- 16.44%
ZFL.TO vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZFL.TO BMO Long Federal Bond | 2.39% | -5.14% | -2.20% | 7.30% | -23.89% | -7.47% | 12.68% | 8.73% | 2.69% | 2.84% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 12.32% | 12.42% | 35.71% | 23.54% | -12.34% | 27.63% | 16.32% | 24.91% | 3.60% | 14.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZFL.TO and VOO is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2010 | -0.09 |
The correlation between ZFL.TO and VOO shifts across timeframes, from -0.09 (all time) to 0.22 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
ZFL.TO vs. VOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ZFL.TO
VOO
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
ZFL.TO
VOO
Basic Materials
ZFL.TO
-
VOO
Communication Services
ZFL.TO
-
VOO
Consumer Cyclical
ZFL.TO
-
VOO
Consumer Defensive
ZFL.TO
-
VOO
Energy
ZFL.TO
-
VOO
Healthcare
ZFL.TO
-
VOO
Industrials
ZFL.TO
-
VOO
Real Estate
ZFL.TO
-
VOO
Technology
ZFL.TO
-
VOO
Utilities
ZFL.TO
-
VOO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZFL.TO vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank
ZFL.TO
VOO
ZFL.TO vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO Long Federal Bond (ZFL.TO) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ZFL.TO | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.68 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.54 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 1.50 | -0.50 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.12 | 3.51 | -3.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.22 | 13.34 | -13.56 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ZFL.TO | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.09 | 2.60 | -2.68 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.27 | 1.16 | -1.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.11 | 1.01 | -1.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.16 | 1.15 | -0.99 |
Drawdowns
ZFL.TO vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZFL.TO drawdown since its inception was -40.32%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -27.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZFL.TO and VOO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZFL.TO | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.32% | -27.65% | -12.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.68% | -8.62% | +1.94% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.51% | -18.93% | +4.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.25% | -22.08% | -10.17% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.32% | -27.65% | -12.67% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -31.87% | 0.00% | -31.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.45% | -3.24% | -9.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.82% | 2.26% | +1.56% |
Volatility
ZFL.TO vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison
BMO Long Federal Bond (ZFL.TO) has a higher volatility of 3.14% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 2.60%. This indicates that ZFL.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZFL.TO | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.14% | 2.60% | +0.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.05% | 8.79% | -1.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.72% | 11.64% | -1.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.71% | 14.91% | -0.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.54% | 16.28% | -3.74% |
ZFL.TO vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZFL.TO has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
ZFL.TO vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison
ZFL.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.84%, more than VOO's 1.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 1.03% | 1.13% | 1.24% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.88% | 2.06% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.10% |
ZFL.TO BMO Long Federal Bond | 2.84% | 3.13% | 3.20% | 3.49% | 3.77% | 2.85% | 2.57% | 2.95% | 3.00% | 2.99% | 3.05% | 3.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ZFL.TO and VOO have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.22% for ZFL.TO.
ZFL.TO is categorized as Canadian Government Bonds, while VOO is S&P 500. ZFL.TO tracks FTSE TMX Canada Long Term Federal Bond Index, while VOO tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: BMO and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for ZFL.TO and 0.03% for VOO.
Find the right allocation for ZFL.TO and VOO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer