ZFH.TO vs. ZPR.TO
ZFH.TO (BMO Floating Rate High Yield ETF) and ZPR.TO (BMO Laddered Preferred Share Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ZFH.TO is a High Yield Bonds fund actively managed by BMO, while ZPR.TO is a Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds fund tracking the Solactive Laddered Canadian Preferred Share Index. ZFH.TO is actively managed, while ZPR.TO is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ZFH.TO returned 5.48%/yr vs 8.37%/yr for ZPR.TO. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ZFH.TO charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for ZPR.TO.
Performance
ZFH.TO vs. ZPR.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZFH.TO achieves a 2.58% return, which is significantly lower than ZPR.TO's 7.75% return. Over the past 10 years, ZFH.TO has underperformed ZPR.TO with an annualized return of 5.48%, while ZPR.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 8.37% annualized return.
ZFH.TO
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.26%
- 6M
- 1.97%
- YTD
- 2.58%
- 1Y
- 4.55%
- 3Y*
- 8.89%
- 5Y*
- 6.65%
- 10Y*
- 5.48%
ZPR.TO
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 1.78%
- 6M
- 7.31%
- YTD
- 7.75%
- 1Y
- 16.36%
- 3Y*
- 19.93%
- 5Y*
- 8.26%
- 10Y*
- 8.37%
ZFH.TO vs. ZPR.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZFH.TO BMO Floating Rate High Yield ETF | 2.58% | 5.61% | 11.66% | 13.66% | -0.89% | 4.79% | -3.87% | 11.18% | 0.77% | 5.45% |
ZPR.TO BMO Laddered Preferred Share Index ETF | 7.75% | 18.58% | 26.58% | 7.21% | -17.66% | 23.77% | 6.00% | 1.94% | -9.77% | 14.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZFH.TO and ZPR.TO is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 14, 2014 | 0.17 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZFH.TO vs. ZPR.TO — Risk / Return Rank
ZFH.TO
ZPR.TO
ZFH.TO vs. ZPR.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO Floating Rate High Yield ETF (ZFH.TO) and BMO Laddered Preferred Share Index ETF (ZPR.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ZFH.TO | ZPR.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.61 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.80 | -0.56 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.40 | 6.66 | -5.26 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.84 | 37.99 | -33.14 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ZFH.TO vs. ZPR.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZFH.TO drawdown since its inception was -21.41%, smaller than the maximum ZPR.TO drawdown of -44.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZFH.TO and ZPR.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZFH.TO | ZPR.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.41% | -44.72% | +23.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.27% | -2.47% | -0.80% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.39% | -8.75% | +2.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -9.75% | -23.06% | +13.31% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -21.41% | -44.13% | +22.72% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.26% | 0.00% | -0.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.05% | -9.21% | +7.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.94% | 0.43% | +0.51% |
Volatility
ZFH.TO vs. ZPR.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for BMO Floating Rate High Yield ETF (ZFH.TO) is 0.57%, while BMO Laddered Preferred Share Index ETF (ZPR.TO) has a volatility of 0.84%. This indicates that ZFH.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZPR.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZFH.TO | ZPR.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.57% | 0.84% | -0.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.78% | 2.67% | +0.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.74% | 4.29% | -0.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.11% | 8.32% | -0.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.43% | 11.42% | -1.99% |
ZFH.TO vs. ZPR.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZFH.TO has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than ZPR.TO's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
ZFH.TO vs. ZPR.TO - Dividend Comparison
ZFH.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.17%, more than ZPR.TO's 5.06% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZFH.TO BMO Floating Rate High Yield ETF | 5.17% | 5.58% | 7.82% | 7.07% | 4.81% | 4.54% | 4.57% | 4.32% | 4.51% | 4.64% | 4.70% | 5.01% |
ZPR.TO BMO Laddered Preferred Share Index ETF | 5.06% | 4.86% | 4.93% | 5.92% | 5.97% | 4.66% | 5.48% | 5.09% | 4.82% | 4.08% | 5.14% | 5.65% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ZFH.TO and ZPR.TO have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ZFH.TO is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ZFH.TO is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for ZPR.TO.
ZFH.TO is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while ZPR.TO is Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for ZFH.TO and 0.45% for ZPR.TO.
Find the right allocation for ZFH.TO and ZPR.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer