ZFH.TO vs. LDRH
Compare and contrast key facts about BMO Floating Rate High Yield ETF (ZFH.TO) and iShares iBonds 1-5 Year High Yield and Income Ladder ETF (LDRH).
ZFH.TO and LDRH are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ZFH.TO is an actively managed fund by BMO. It was launched on Feb 10, 2014. LDRH is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the BlackRock iBonds 1-5 Year High Yield and Income Ladder Index. It was launched on Nov 7, 2024.
Performance
ZFH.TO vs. LDRH - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ZFH.TO vs. LDRH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
ZFH.TO BMO Floating Rate High Yield ETF | -1.23% | 5.53% | 0.38% |
LDRH iShares iBonds 1-5 Year High Yield and Income Ladder ETF | 1.94% | 2.26% | 3.65% |
Different Trading Currencies
ZFH.TO is traded in CAD, while LDRH is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the LDRH values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZFH.TO achieves a -1.23% return, which is significantly lower than LDRH's 1.94% return.
ZFH.TO
- 1D
- 0.61%
- 1M
- -0.84%
- YTD
- -1.23%
- 6M
- -1.13%
- 1Y
- 5.13%
- 3Y*
- 8.82%
- 5Y*
- 6.20%
- 10Y*
- 5.30%
LDRH
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 1.88%
- YTD
- 1.94%
- 6M
- 1.44%
- 1Y
- 3.60%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ZFH.TO vs. LDRH - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZFH.TO has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than LDRH's 0.35% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ZFH.TO vs. LDRH — Risk / Return Rank
ZFH.TO
LDRH
ZFH.TO vs. LDRH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO Floating Rate High Yield ETF (ZFH.TO) and iShares iBonds 1-5 Year High Yield and Income Ladder ETF (LDRH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ZFH.TO | LDRH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.89 | 0.61 | +0.28 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.21 | 0.83 | +0.38 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.11 | +0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.19 | 0.67 | +0.51 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.63 | 1.65 | +2.98 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ZFH.TO | LDRH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 | 0.61 | +0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.61 | 0.99 | -0.38 |
Correlation
The correlation between ZFH.TO and LDRH is 0.09, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
ZFH.TO vs. LDRH - Dividend Comparison
ZFH.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.42%, less than LDRH's 6.98% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZFH.TO BMO Floating Rate High Yield ETF | 5.42% | 5.52% | 7.72% | 6.98% | 4.75% | 4.48% | 4.51% | 4.27% | 4.45% | 4.58% | 4.64% | 4.94% |
LDRH iShares iBonds 1-5 Year High Yield and Income Ladder ETF | 6.98% | 6.41% | 1.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
ZFH.TO vs. LDRH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZFH.TO drawdown since its inception was -20.98%, which is greater than LDRH's maximum drawdown of -6.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZFH.TO and LDRH.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZFH.TO | LDRH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.98% | -3.17% | -17.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.26% | -2.82% | -1.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -9.53% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -20.98% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.61% | -0.32% | -2.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.82% | -0.25% | -1.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.09% | 0.46% | +0.63% |
Volatility
ZFH.TO vs. LDRH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for BMO Floating Rate High Yield ETF (ZFH.TO) is 1.61%, while iShares iBonds 1-5 Year High Yield and Income Ladder ETF (LDRH) has a volatility of 1.77%. This indicates that ZFH.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LDRH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ZFH.TO | LDRH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.61% | 1.77% | -0.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.03% | 3.74% | -0.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.79% | 5.94% | -0.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.46% | 5.83% | +0.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.38% | 5.83% | +2.55% |