PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
ZFH.TO vs. FLRT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

ZFH.TO vs. FLRT

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ZFH.TO (BMO Floating Rate High Yield ETF) and FLRT (Pacific Global Senior Loan ETF) are both High Yield Bonds funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 10 years, ZFH.TO returned 5.61%/yr vs 5.76%/yr for FLRT. At a correlation of -0.11, they often move in opposite directions. ZFH.TO charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for FLRT.

Performance

ZFH.TO vs. FLRT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BMO Floating Rate High Yield ETF (ZFH.TO) and Pacific Global Senior Loan ETF (FLRT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

ZFH.TO is traded in CAD, while FLRT is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the FLRT values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZFH.TO achieves a 2.17% return, which is significantly lower than FLRT's 3.13% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with ZFH.TO having a 5.61% annualized return and FLRT not far ahead at 5.76%.

ZFH.TO

1D
0.00%
1M
0.62%
YTD
2.17%
6M
1.34%
1Y
5.99%
3Y*
9.48%
5Y*
6.72%
10Y*
5.61%

FLRT

1D
0.26%
1M
2.92%
YTD
3.13%
6M
2.15%
1Y
7.45%
3Y*
10.16%
5Y*
9.01%
10Y*
5.76%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZFH.TO vs. FLRT - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ZFH.TO
BMO Floating Rate High Yield ETF		2.17%5.53%11.55%13.55%-0.94%4.73%-3.93%11.12%0.72%5.39%
FLRT
Pacific Global Senior Loan ETF		3.13%1.37%18.56%12.07%4.21%2.25%1.05%4.06%7.25%-4.76%

Correlation

The correlation between ZFH.TO and FLRT is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.04

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.16

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2015

-0.11

The correlation between ZFH.TO and FLRT shifts across timeframes, from -0.16 (5 years) to -0.04 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ZFH.TO vs. FLRT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
ZFH.TO
FLRT

Real Estate

6.8%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

0.8%

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

99.2%

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Real Estate

ZFH.TO
6.8%
FLRT

-

Basic Materials

ZFH.TO

-

FLRT

-

Communication Services

ZFH.TO

-

FLRT
0.8%

Consumer Cyclical

ZFH.TO

-

FLRT

-

Consumer Defensive

ZFH.TO

-

FLRT

-

Energy

ZFH.TO

-

FLRT

-

Financial Services

ZFH.TO

-

FLRT
99.2%

Healthcare

ZFH.TO

-

FLRT

-

Industrials

ZFH.TO

-

FLRT

-

Technology

ZFH.TO

-

FLRT

-

Utilities

ZFH.TO

-

FLRT

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

BMO Floating Rate High Yield ETF

Pacific Global Senior Loan ETF

Often compared with ZFH.TO:
ZFH.TO vs. DXV.TOZFH.TO vs. ZCS.TOZFH.TO vs. GFEA.DEZFH.TO vs. XSI.TOZFH.TO vs. XSH.TOZFH.TO vs. VAB.TOZFH.TO vs. XSB.TO
Often compared with FLRT:
FLRT vs. FLBLFLRT vs. SEIXFLRT vs. FMFFLRT vs. FLTBFLRT vs. AAAFLRT vs. SHYDFLRT vs. BKLN

Return for Risk

ZFH.TO vs. FLRT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
ZFH.TO
ZFH.TO Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
ZFH.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZFH.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZFH.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
ZFH.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZFH.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
FLRT
FLRT Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
FLRT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLRT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLRT Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
FLRT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLRT Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZFH.TO vs. FLRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO Floating Rate High Yield ETF (ZFH.TO) and Pacific Global Senior Loan ETF (FLRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

ZFH.TOFLRTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.54
1.57

-0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.23
2.18

+0.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.29

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.84

1.80

+0.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.33

5.25

+1.08

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ZFH.TO vs. FLRT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZFH.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.54, which is comparable to the FLRT Sharpe Ratio of 1.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZFH.TO and FLRT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

ZFH.TOFLRTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.54

1.57

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.05

1.43

-0.37

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

0.66

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.64

0.62

+0.02

Drawdowns

ZFH.TO vs. FLRT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZFH.TO drawdown since its inception was -20.98%, which is greater than FLRT's maximum drawdown of -15.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZFH.TO and FLRT.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

ZFH.TOFLRTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.98%

-15.29%

-5.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.27%

-4.15%

+0.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.40%

-6.98%

+0.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.53%

-7.13%

-2.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.98%

-15.29%

-5.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.20%

0.00%

-0.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.80%

-2.65%

+0.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.95%

1.42%

-0.47%

Volatility

ZFH.TO vs. FLRT - Volatility Comparison

BMO Floating Rate High Yield ETF (ZFH.TO) has a higher volatility of 0.96% compared to Pacific Global Senior Loan ETF (FLRT) at 0.88%. This indicates that ZFH.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLRT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

ZFH.TOFLRTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.96%

0.88%

+0.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.01%

3.77%

-0.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.92%

4.76%

-0.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.42%

6.35%

+0.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.33%

8.69%

-0.36%

ZFH.TO vs. FLRT - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZFH.TO has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than FLRT's 0.69% expense ratio.

Dividends

ZFH.TO vs. FLRT - Dividend Comparison

ZFH.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.21%, less than FLRT's 6.81% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLRT
Pacific Global Senior Loan ETF		6.81%6.93%7.93%8.40%5.81%3.16%3.52%4.30%3.95%3.20%3.38%3.21%
ZFH.TO
BMO Floating Rate High Yield ETF		5.21%5.52%7.72%6.98%4.75%4.48%4.51%4.27%4.45%4.58%4.64%4.94%

Frequently Asked Questions

ZFH.TO and FLRT have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ZFH.TO is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ZFH.TO is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for FLRT.

They also come from different issuers: BMO and Pacific Life. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for ZFH.TO and 0.69% for FLRT.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZFH.TO and FLRT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer