PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZFEB vs. NVDO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ZFEB vs. NVDO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr February (ZFEB) and Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated NVDA Monthly ETF (NVDO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZFEB achieves a 2.36% return, which is significantly lower than NVDO's 18.85% return.


ZFEB

1D
-0.04%
1M
0.81%
YTD
2.36%
6M
3.03%
1Y
7.80%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

NVDO

1D
-2.46%
1M
14.15%
YTD
18.85%
6M
29.58%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZFEB vs. NVDO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between ZFEB and NVDO is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 14, 2025

0.55

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZFEB vs. NVDO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZFEB
ZFEB Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
ZFEB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZFEB Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZFEB Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
ZFEB Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZFEB Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

NVDO
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZFEB vs. NVDO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr February (ZFEB) and Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated NVDA Monthly ETF (NVDO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ZFEBNVDODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.55

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

5.61

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.79

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

5.81

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

28.36

ZFEB vs. NVDO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ZFEBNVDODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.55

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.24

1.30

+0.93

Drawdowns

ZFEB vs. NVDO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZFEB drawdown since its inception was -3.00%, smaller than the maximum NVDO drawdown of -16.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZFEB and NVDO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZFEBNVDODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.00%

-16.25%

+13.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.04%

-2.68%

+2.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.36%

-4.99%

+4.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.28%

Volatility

ZFEB vs. NVDO - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZFEBNVDODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.21%

31.93%

-29.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.88%

31.93%

-29.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.88%

31.93%

-29.05%

ZFEB vs. NVDO - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZFEB has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than NVDO's 0.77% expense ratio.


Dividends

ZFEB vs. NVDO - Dividend Comparison

ZFEB has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NVDO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.02%.


Frequently Asked Questions


ZFEB and NVDO have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, NVDO is cheaper at 0.77% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

NVDO is cheaper with a 0.77% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for ZFEB.

NVDO has the higher dividend yield at 14.02%, compared with 0.00% for ZFEB.

They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for ZFEB and 0.77% for NVDO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZFEB and NVDO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer