ZETA vs. CEG

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Zeta Global Holdings Corp. (ZETA) and Constellation Energy Corp (CEG).

Performance

ZETA vs. CEG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Zeta Global Holdings Corp. (ZETA) and Constellation Energy Corp (CEG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

ZETA vs. CEG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
ZETA Zeta Global Holdings Corp.	-21.77%	13.12%	103.97%	7.96%	-17.97%
CEG Constellation Energy Corp	-20.85%	58.80%	92.71%	37.24%	64.11%

Fundamentals

EPS ZETA : -$0.21 CEG : $7.39
PS Ratio ZETA : 1.79 CEG : 3.35
Total Revenue (TTM) ZETA : $1.30B CEG : $26.15B
Gross Profit (TTM) ZETA : $791.08M CEG : -$3.91B
EBITDA (TTM) ZETA : $39.32M CEG : $3.98B

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with ZETA having a -21.77% return and CEG slightly higher at -20.85%.

ZETA

• 1D: 7.49%
• 1M: -6.08%
• YTD: -21.77%
• 6M: -19.88%
• 1Y: 17.40%
• 3Y*: 13.70%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CEG

• 1D: -6.48%
• 1M: -15.23%
• YTD: -20.85%
• 6M: -14.93%
• 1Y: 39.20%
• 3Y*: 53.80%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

ZETA vs. CEG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZETA

ZETA Risk / Return Rank: 52
ZETA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
ZETA Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
ZETA Omega Ratio Rank: 52
ZETA Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
ZETA Martin Ratio Rank: 52

CEG

CEG Risk / Return Rank: 65
CEG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
CEG Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
CEG Omega Ratio Rank: 63
CEG Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
CEG Martin Ratio Rank: 65

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZETA vs. CEG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Zeta Global Holdings Corp. (ZETA) and Constellation Energy Corp (CEG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ZETA	CEG	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.24	0.76	-0.52
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.95	1.32	-0.37
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.11	1.17	-0.06
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.39	0.95	-0.56
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	0.93	2.57	-1.64
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ZETA vs. CEG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZETA Sharpe Ratio is 0.24, which is lower than the CEG Sharpe Ratio of 0.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZETA and CEG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ZETA	CEG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.24	0.76	-0.52
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.18	1.03	-0.85

Correlation

The correlation between ZETA and CEG is 0.25, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

ZETA vs. CEG - Dividend Comparison

ZETA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CEG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.57%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
ZETA Zeta Global Holdings Corp.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
CEG Constellation Energy Corp	0.57%	0.44%	0.63%	0.97%	0.65%

Drawdowns

ZETA vs. CEG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZETA drawdown since its inception was -70.01%, which is greater than CEG's maximum drawdown of -50.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZETA and CEG.

Drawdown Indicators

	ZETA	CEG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-70.01%	-50.70%	-19.31%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-40.37%	-38.77%	-1.60%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-56.67%	-30.70%	-25.97%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-33.41%	-10.82%	-22.59%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	16.87%	14.27%	+2.60%

Volatility

ZETA vs. CEG - Volatility Comparison

Zeta Global Holdings Corp. (ZETA) has a higher volatility of 18.56% compared to Constellation Energy Corp (CEG) at 16.75%. This indicates that ZETA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CEG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ZETA	CEG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	18.56%	16.75%	+1.81%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	49.43%	36.99%	+12.44%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	72.64%	51.89%	+20.75%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	72.31%	49.33%	+22.98%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	72.31%	49.33%	+22.98%

Financials