PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZEQ.TO vs. BIL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ZEQ.TO vs. BIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BMO MSCI Europe High Quality Hedged to CAD Index ETF (ZEQ.TO) and SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

ZEQ.TO is traded in CAD, while BIL is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the BIL values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZEQ.TO achieves a 1.89% return, which is significantly lower than BIL's 2.78% return. Over the past 10 years, ZEQ.TO has outperformed BIL with an annualized return of 8.55%, while BIL has yielded a comparatively lower 2.92% annualized return.


ZEQ.TO

1D
-0.83%
1M
2.57%
YTD
1.89%
6M
2.82%
1Y
4.15%
3Y*
5.01%
5Y*
4.74%
10Y*
8.55%

BIL

1D
0.43%
1M
2.29%
YTD
2.78%
6M
1.38%
1Y
5.21%
3Y*
5.85%
5Y*
6.36%
10Y*
2.92%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZEQ.TO vs. BIL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ZEQ.TO
BMO MSCI Europe High Quality Hedged to CAD Index ETF
1.89%7.89%2.54%15.35%-12.26%25.16%6.22%33.21%-7.10%15.45%
BIL
SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF
2.78%-0.63%14.23%2.63%8.63%-1.00%-1.30%-2.98%10.37%-5.73%

Correlation

The correlation between ZEQ.TO and BIL is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.27

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 18, 2014

-0.23

The correlation between ZEQ.TO and BIL shifts across timeframes, from -0.27 (5 years) to -0.14 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZEQ.TO vs. BIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZEQ.TO
ZEQ.TO Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
ZEQ.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZEQ.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZEQ.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
ZEQ.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZEQ.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

BIL
BIL Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
BIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
BIL Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
BIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
BIL Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZEQ.TO vs. BIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO MSCI Europe High Quality Hedged to CAD Index ETF (ZEQ.TO) and SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ZEQ.TOBILDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.81

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.20

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.38

1.40

-1.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.11

3.87

-2.77

ZEQ.TO vs. BIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZEQ.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.32, which is lower than the BIL Sharpe Ratio of 1.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZEQ.TO and BIL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ZEQ.TOBILDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

1.13

-0.81

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

1.01

-0.67

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

0.43

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

0.31

+0.24

Drawdowns

ZEQ.TO vs. BIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZEQ.TO drawdown since its inception was -29.13%, which is greater than BIL's maximum drawdown of -19.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZEQ.TO and BIL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZEQ.TOBILDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.13%

-19.20%

-9.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.97%

-3.73%

-7.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.47%

-5.19%

-9.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.54%

-5.19%

-15.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.13%

-17.20%

-11.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.20%

0.00%

-4.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.31%

-8.13%

+3.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.76%

1.35%

+2.41%

Volatility

ZEQ.TO vs. BIL - Volatility Comparison

BMO MSCI Europe High Quality Hedged to CAD Index ETF (ZEQ.TO) has a higher volatility of 4.59% compared to SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL) at 0.79%. This indicates that ZEQ.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZEQ.TOBILDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.59%

0.79%

+3.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.60%

3.49%

+7.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.15%

4.65%

+8.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.18%

6.36%

+7.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.51%

6.77%

+8.74%

ZEQ.TO vs. BIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZEQ.TO has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than BIL's 0.14% expense ratio.


Dividends

ZEQ.TO vs. BIL - Dividend Comparison

ZEQ.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.02%, less than BIL's 3.86% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BIL
SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF
3.86%4.13%5.03%4.92%1.35%0.00%0.30%2.05%1.66%0.68%0.07%0.00%
ZEQ.TO
BMO MSCI Europe High Quality Hedged to CAD Index ETF
3.02%3.10%2.04%2.50%2.62%1.78%1.94%2.04%3.21%2.07%2.01%2.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


ZEQ.TO and BIL have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BIL is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BIL is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for ZEQ.TO.

ZEQ.TO is categorized as Europe Equities, while BIL is Government Bonds. ZEQ.TO tracks MSCI Europe Quality 100% Hedged to CAD Index, while BIL tracks Bloomberg 1-3 Month U.S. Treasury Bill Index. They also come from different issuers: BMO and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for ZEQ.TO and 0.14% for BIL.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZEQ.TO and BIL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer