ZECP vs. PDBC
ZECP (Zacks Earnings Consistent Portfolio ETF) and PDBC (Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ZECP is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Zacks, while PDBC is a Commodities fund actively managed by Invesco. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, ZECP returned 15.85%/yr vs 14.42%/yr for PDBC. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ZECP charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for PDBC.
Performance
ZECP vs. PDBC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZECP achieves a 6.36% return, which is significantly lower than PDBC's 36.23% return.
ZECP
- 1D
- -0.48%
- 1M
- 2.51%
- YTD
- 6.36%
- 6M
- 5.67%
- 1Y
- 20.73%
- 3Y*
- 15.85%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PDBC
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- -3.37%
- YTD
- 36.23%
- 6M
- 36.27%
- 1Y
- 45.46%
- 3Y*
- 14.42%
- 5Y*
- 12.39%
- 10Y*
- 8.79%
ZECP vs. PDBC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZECP Zacks Earnings Consistent Portfolio ETF | 6.36% | 15.03% | 17.32% | 13.88% | -13.41% | 7.75% |
PDBC Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF | 36.23% | 5.96% | 2.09% | -6.25% | 19.23% | 9.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZECP and PDBC is -0.21, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.21 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 25, 2021 | 0.09 |
The correlation between ZECP and PDBC shifts across timeframes, from -0.21 (1 year) to 0.09 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZECP vs. PDBC — Risk / Return Rank
ZECP
PDBC
ZECP vs. PDBC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Zacks Earnings Consistent Portfolio ETF (ZECP) and Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (PDBC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ZECP | PDBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.48 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.43 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.50 | 6.35 | -3.85 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.46 | 13.39 | -1.93 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ZECP | PDBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.98 | 2.46 | -0.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.65 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.50 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.63 | 0.23 | +0.40 |
Drawdowns
ZECP vs. PDBC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZECP drawdown since its inception was -21.86%, smaller than the maximum PDBC drawdown of -49.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZECP and PDBC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZECP | PDBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.86% | -49.52% | +27.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.32% | -7.19% | -1.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.47% | -13.95% | -1.52% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -27.63% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -40.73% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.51% | -4.55% | +4.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.51% | -23.21% | +17.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.81% | 3.41% | -1.60% |
Volatility
ZECP vs. PDBC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Zacks Earnings Consistent Portfolio ETF (ZECP) is 2.14%, while Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (PDBC) has a volatility of 6.20%. This indicates that ZECP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PDBC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZECP | PDBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.14% | 6.20% | -4.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.08% | 15.78% | -7.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.51% | 18.61% | -8.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.65% | 19.12% | -4.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.65% | 17.78% | -3.13% |
ZECP vs. PDBC - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZECP has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than PDBC's 0.58% expense ratio.
Dividends
ZECP vs. PDBC - Dividend Comparison
ZECP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.74%, less than PDBC's 2.82% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PDBC Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF | 2.82% | 3.84% | 4.42% | 4.21% | 13.05% | 50.83% | 0.01% | 1.40% | 1.00% | 3.83% | 6.51% |
ZECP Zacks Earnings Consistent Portfolio ETF | 0.74% | 0.79% | 0.63% | 0.73% | 0.91% | 0.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ZECP and PDBC have a correlation of -0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PDBC has higher volatility (6.20%) compared to ZECP (2.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ZECP dropped -21.86% vs PDBC's -49.52%.
On 3-year performance, ZECP leads with 15.85% vs 14.42% for PDBC. On fees, ZECP is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, ZECP has been the lower-risk option at 2.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, ZECP has performed better with a 15.85% return vs 14.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ZECP is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for PDBC.
PDBC has the higher dividend yield at 2.82%, compared with 0.74% for ZECP.
ZECP is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while PDBC is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Zacks and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for ZECP and 0.58% for PDBC.
PDBC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs 1.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ZECP and PDBC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer