ZECP vs. CGDV

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ZECP (Zacks Earnings Consistent Portfolio ETF) and CGDV (Capital Group Dividend Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ZECP is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Zacks, while CGDV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Capital Group. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, ZECP returned 15.85%/yr vs 25.14%/yr for CGDV. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ZECP charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.33%/yr for CGDV.

Performance

ZECP vs. CGDV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Zacks Earnings Consistent Portfolio ETF (ZECP) and Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZECP achieves a 6.36% return, which is significantly lower than CGDV's 11.89% return.

ZECP

• 1D: -0.48%
• 1M: 2.51%
• YTD: 6.36%
• 6M: 5.67%
• 1Y: 20.73%
• 3Y*: 15.85%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CGDV

• 1D: -0.55%
• 1M: 5.09%
• YTD: 11.89%
• 6M: 12.43%
• 1Y: 30.91%
• 3Y*: 25.14%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZECP vs. CGDV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
ZECP Zacks Earnings Consistent Portfolio ETF	6.36%	15.03%	17.32%	13.88%	-3.49%
CGDV Capital Group Dividend Value ETF	11.89%	25.50%	20.10%	28.81%	-2.89%

Correlation

The correlation between ZECP and CGDV is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.80
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.85
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2022	0.88

The correlation between ZECP and CGDV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

ZECP vs. CGDV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ZECP	CGDV
Technology	25.3%	34.1%
Financial Services	16.1%	6.8%
Industrials	14.8%	13.2%
Healthcare	13.3%	11.5%
Communication Services	10.7%	8.4%
Consumer Defensive	8.3%	5.5%
Consumer Cyclical	5.9%	10.6%
Utilities	3.9%	2.1%
Energy	1.0%	3.8%
Real Estate	0.7%	1.1%
Basic Materials	-	2.9%

Return for Risk

ZECP vs. CGDV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZECP

ZECP Risk / Return Rank: 59
ZECP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
ZECP Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
ZECP Omega Ratio Rank: 56
ZECP Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
ZECP Martin Ratio Rank: 64

CGDV

CGDV Risk / Return Rank: 76
CGDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
CGDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
CGDV Omega Ratio Rank: 82
CGDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
CGDV Martin Ratio Rank: 77

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZECP vs. CGDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Zacks Earnings Consistent Portfolio ETF (ZECP) and Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ZECP	CGDV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.98	2.68	-0.70
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.94	3.69	-0.75
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.50	-0.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.50	3.18	-0.68
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.46	15.06	-3.60
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ZECP vs. CGDV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZECP Sharpe Ratio is 1.98, which is comparable to the CGDV Sharpe Ratio of 2.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZECP and CGDV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ZECP	CGDV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.98	2.68	-0.70
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.63	1.24	-0.61

Drawdowns

ZECP vs. CGDV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZECP drawdown since its inception was -21.86%, roughly equal to the maximum CGDV drawdown of -21.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZECP and CGDV.

Drawdown Indicators

	ZECP	CGDV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.86%	-21.82%	-0.04%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.32%	-9.75%	+1.43%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.47%	-14.28%	-1.19%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.51%	-0.55%	+0.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.51%	-3.62%	-1.89%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.81%	2.06%	-0.25%

Volatility

ZECP vs. CGDV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Zacks Earnings Consistent Portfolio ETF (ZECP) is 2.14%, while Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV) has a volatility of 3.09%. This indicates that ZECP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CGDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ZECP	CGDV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.14%	3.09%	-0.95%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.08%	9.13%	-1.05%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.51%	11.59%	-1.08%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.65%	15.48%	-0.83%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.65%	15.48%	-0.83%

ZECP vs. CGDV - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZECP has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than CGDV's 0.33% expense ratio.

Dividends

ZECP vs. CGDV - Dividend Comparison

ZECP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.74%, less than CGDV's 1.17% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
CGDV Capital Group Dividend Value ETF	1.17%	1.29%	1.60%	1.65%	1.36%	0.00%
ZECP Zacks Earnings Consistent Portfolio ETF	0.74%	0.79%	0.63%	0.73%	0.91%	0.11%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ZECP and CGDV in my portfolio?

ZECP and CGDV have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ZECP or CGDV?

CGDV has higher volatility (3.09%) compared to ZECP (2.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ZECP dropped -21.86% vs CGDV's -21.82%.

Which ETF is better, ZECP or CGDV?

On 3-year performance, CGDV leads with 25.14% vs 15.85% for ZECP. On fees, CGDV is cheaper at 0.33% per year. On volatility, ZECP has been the lower-risk option at 2.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ZECP or CGDV?

Over the 3-year period, CGDV has performed better with a 25.14% return vs 15.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ZECP or CGDV?

CGDV is cheaper with a 0.33% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for ZECP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ZECP or CGDV?

CGDV has the higher dividend yield at 1.17%, compared with 0.74% for ZECP.

What is the main difference between ZECP and CGDV?

ZECP is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while CGDV is Large Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: Zacks and Capital Group. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for ZECP and 0.33% for CGDV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CGDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.68 vs 1.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.