ZECP vs. CAOS
ZECP (Zacks Earnings Consistent Portfolio ETF) and CAOS (Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ZECP is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Zacks, while CAOS is a Options Trading fund actively managed by Alpha Architect. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, ZECP returned 14.80%/yr vs 3.48%/yr for CAOS. Their 0.09 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. ZECP charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.63%/yr for CAOS.
Performance
ZECP vs. CAOS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZECP achieves a 8.60% return, which is significantly higher than CAOS's 0.76% return.
ZECP
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- -0.58%
- 6M
- 6.82%
- YTD
- 8.60%
- 1Y
- 18.64%
- 3Y*
- 14.80%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 9.36%
CAOS
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- -0.01%
- 6M
- 0.16%
- YTD
- 0.76%
- 1Y
- 1.73%
- 3Y*
- 3.48%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 4.70%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $6.81M | $5.39M | $5.09M | |
| $1.64M | $1.62M | $1.64M |
ZECP vs. CAOS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ZECP Zacks Earnings Consistent Portfolio ETF | 8.60% | 15.03% | 17.32% | 12.57% |
CAOS Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF | 0.76% | 2.55% | 5.33% | 7.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZECP and CAOS is -0.30, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.30 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | -0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 6, 2023 | 0.09 |
The correlation between ZECP and CAOS shifts across timeframes, from -0.30 (1 year) to 0.09 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZECP vs. CAOS — Risk / Return Rank
ZECP
CAOS
ZECP vs. CAOS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Zacks Earnings Consistent Portfolio ETF (ZECP) and Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF (CAOS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ZECP | CAOS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.45 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.56 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.24 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.13 | 2.47 | -0.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.58 | 5.45 | +4.13 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ZECP vs. CAOS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZECP drawdown since its inception was -21.86%, which is greater than CAOS's maximum drawdown of -3.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZECP and CAOS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZECP | CAOS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.86% | -3.89% | -17.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.32% | -0.76% | -7.56% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.47% | -3.60% | -11.87% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.58% | -1.13% | +0.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.35% | -0.92% | -4.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.85% | 0.34% | +1.51% |
Volatility
ZECP vs. CAOS - Volatility Comparison
Zacks Earnings Consistent Portfolio ETF (ZECP) has a higher volatility of 2.82% compared to Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF (CAOS) at 0.51%. This indicates that ZECP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CAOS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZECP | CAOS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.82% | 0.51% | +2.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.49% | 1.07% | +7.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.85% | 1.57% | +9.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.53% | 4.18% | +10.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.53% | 4.18% | +10.35% |
ZECP vs. CAOS - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZECP has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than CAOS's 0.63% expense ratio.
Dividends
ZECP vs. CAOS - Dividend Comparison
ZECP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.73%, while CAOS has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CAOS Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ZECP Zacks Earnings Consistent Portfolio ETF | 0.73% | 0.79% | 0.63% | 0.73% | 0.91% | 0.11% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ZECP and CAOS have a correlation of -0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ZECP has higher volatility (2.82%) compared to CAOS (0.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ZECP dropped -21.86% vs CAOS's -3.89%.
On 3-year performance, ZECP leads with 14.80% vs 3.48% for CAOS. On fees, ZECP is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, CAOS has been the lower-risk option at 0.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, ZECP has performed better with a 14.80% return vs 3.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ZECP is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.63% for CAOS.
ZECP has the higher dividend yield at 0.73%, compared with 0.00% for CAOS.
ZECP is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while CAOS is Options Trading. They also come from different issuers: Zacks and Alpha Architect. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for ZECP and 0.63% for CAOS.
ZECP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.64 vs 1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ZECP and CAOS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer